From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Williamson Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 1/2] Minimal RAM API support Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:11:35 -0700 Message-ID: <1292440295.2862.50.camel@x201> References: <20101213212059.2472.17879.stgit@s20.home> <20101213212430.2472.23807.stgit@s20.home> <201012151723.32164.paul@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, anthony@codemonkey.ws, blauwirbel@gmail.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Brook Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:14460 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754849Ab0LOTLv (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:11:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: <201012151723.32164.paul@codesourcery.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 17:23 +0000, Paul Brook wrote: > > This adds a minimum chunk of Anthony's RAM API support so that we > > can identify actual VM RAM versus all the other things that make > > use of qemu_ram_alloc. > > Why do we care? How are you defining "actual VM RAM"? > > Surely the whole point of qemu_ram_alloc is to allocate a chunk of memory that > can be mapped into the guest physical address space, so all uses of > qemu_ram_alloc should be using this API. http://wiki.qemu.org/Features/RamAPI