From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Avi Kiviti <avi@redhat.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC -v3 PATCH 2/3] sched: add yield_to function
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 19:04:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1294164289.2016.186.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110103162918.577a9620@annuminas.surriel.com>
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 16:29 -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
>
> Add a yield_to function to the scheduler code, allowing us to
> give enough of our timeslice to another thread to allow it to
> run and release whatever resource we need it to release.
>
> We may want to use this to provide a sys_yield_to system call
> one day.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
> Not-signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
>
> ---
> Mike, want to change the above into a Signed-off-by: ? :)
> This code seems to work well.
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index c5f926c..0b8a3e6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1083,6 +1083,7 @@ struct sched_class {
> void (*enqueue_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wakeup);
> void (*dequeue_task) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sleep);
> void (*yield_task) (struct rq *rq);
> + int (*yield_to_task) (struct task_struct *p, int preempt);
>
> void (*check_preempt_curr) (struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags);
>
> @@ -1981,6 +1982,7 @@ static inline int rt_mutex_getprio(struct task_struct *p)
> # define rt_mutex_adjust_pi(p) do { } while (0)
> #endif
>
> +extern void yield_to(struct task_struct *p, int preempt);
> extern void set_user_nice(struct task_struct *p, long nice);
> extern int task_prio(const struct task_struct *p);
> extern int task_nice(const struct task_struct *p);
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index f8e5a25..ffa7a9d 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -6901,6 +6901,53 @@ void __sched yield(void)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(yield);
>
> +/**
> + * yield_to - yield the current processor to another thread in
> + * your thread group, or accelerate that thread toward the
> + * processor it's on.
> + *
> + * It's the caller's job to ensure that the target task struct
> + * can't go away on us before we can do any checks.
> + */
> +void __sched yield_to(struct task_struct *p, int preempt)
> +{
> + struct task_struct *curr = current;
> + struct rq *rq, *p_rq;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int yield = 0;
> +
> + local_irq_save(flags);
> + rq = this_rq();
> +
> +again:
> + p_rq = task_rq(p);
> + double_rq_lock(rq, p_rq);
> + while (task_rq(p) != p_rq) {
> + double_rq_unlock(rq, p_rq);
> + goto again;
> + }
> +
> + if (task_running(p_rq, p) || p->state || !p->se.on_rq ||
> + !same_thread_group(p, curr) ||
> + !curr->sched_class->yield_to_task ||
> + curr->sched_class != p->sched_class) {
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + yield = curr->sched_class->yield_to_task(p, preempt);
> +
> +out:
> + double_rq_unlock(rq, p_rq);
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> +
> + if (yield) {
> + set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> + schedule();
> + }
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(yield_to);
This definitely wants to be EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() and if it were possible
I'd make it so only kvm.o could use it. It really sucks that kvm is a
module.
> /*
> * This task is about to go to sleep on IO. Increment rq->nr_iowait so
> * that process accounting knows that this is a task in IO wait state.
> diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> index 5119b08..3288e7c 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> @@ -1119,6 +1119,61 @@ static void yield_task_fair(struct rq *rq)
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +static void pull_task(struct rq *src_rq, struct task_struct *p,
> + struct rq *this_rq, int this_cpu);
> +#endif
> +
> +static int yield_to_task_fair(struct task_struct *p, int preempt)
> +{
> + struct sched_entity *se = ¤t->se;
> + struct sched_entity *pse = &p->se;
> + struct sched_entity *curr = &(task_rq(p)->curr)->se;
> + struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
> + struct cfs_rq *p_cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(pse);
> + int yield = this_rq() == task_rq(p);
> + int want_preempt = preempt;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
> + if (cfs_rq->tg != p_cfs_rq->tg)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* Preemption only allowed within the same task group. */
> + if (preempt && cfs_rq->tg != cfs_rq_of(curr)->tg)
> + preempt = 0;
> +#endif
I'd simply bail if its not the same cgroup, who cares about that case
anyway, all KVM vcpu threads should be in the same cgroup I think.
> + /* Preemption only allowed within the same thread group. */
> + if (preempt && !same_thread_group(current, task_of(p_cfs_rq->curr)))
> + preempt = 0;
The calling site already checks for same_thread_group(), we never even
get here if that's not the case.
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> + /*
> + * If this yield is important enough to want to preempt instead
> + * of only dropping a ->next hint, we're alone, and the target
> + * is not alone, pull the target to this cpu.
> + */
> + if (want_preempt && !yield && cfs_rq->nr_running == 1 &&
> + cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &p->cpus_allowed)) {
> + pull_task(task_rq(p), p, this_rq(), smp_processor_id());
This only works by the grace that the caller checked p->se.on_rq. A
comment might be in order.
> + p_cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(pse);
> + yield = 1;
> + }
> +#endif
> +
> + if (yield)
> + clear_buddies(cfs_rq, se);
> + else if (preempt)
> + clear_buddies(p_cfs_rq, curr);
> +
> + /* Tell the scheduler that we'd really like pse to run next. */
> + p_cfs_rq->next = pse;
> +
> + if (!yield && preempt)
> + resched_task(task_of(p_cfs_rq->curr));
I don't get this.. Why would you resched the remote cpu, surely you
didn't just pull its current task over..
> + return yield;
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
> /*
> @@ -2081,6 +2136,7 @@ static const struct sched_class fair_sched_class = {
> .enqueue_task = enqueue_task_fair,
> .dequeue_task = dequeue_task_fair,
> .yield_task = yield_task_fair,
> + .yield_to_task = yield_to_task_fair,
>
> .check_preempt_curr = check_preempt_wakeup,
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-04 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-03 21:26 [RFC -v3 PATCH 0/3] directed yield for Pause Loop Exiting Rik van Riel
2011-01-03 21:27 ` [RFC -v3 PATCH 1/3] kvm: keep track of which task is running a KVM vcpu Rik van Riel
2011-01-03 21:29 ` [RFC -v3 PATCH 2/3] sched: add yield_to function Rik van Riel
2011-01-04 1:51 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-04 6:14 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-01-04 12:03 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-05 2:39 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-01-05 8:35 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-05 8:40 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-01-05 9:08 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-05 9:30 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-01-05 9:34 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-05 10:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-05 10:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-04 17:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-05 3:17 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-01-04 14:28 ` Hillf Danton
2011-01-04 16:41 ` Hillf Danton
2011-01-04 16:44 ` Rik van Riel
2011-01-04 16:51 ` Hillf Danton
2011-01-04 16:54 ` Rik van Riel
2011-01-04 17:02 ` Hillf Danton
2011-01-04 17:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-04 17:12 ` Hillf Danton
2011-01-04 17:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-04 17:53 ` Rik van Riel
2011-01-04 18:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-04 18:04 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-01-04 18:53 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-05 16:57 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-05 17:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-05 17:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-07 5:29 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-13 3:02 ` Rik van Riel
2011-01-13 3:26 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-13 5:08 ` Rik van Riel
2011-01-06 14:33 ` Hillf Danton
2011-01-05 17:10 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-05 17:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-05 17:19 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-05 17:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-05 17:35 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-05 17:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-06 3:49 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-03 21:30 ` [RFC -v3 PATCH 3/3] Subject: kvm: use yield_to instead of sleep in kvm_vcpu_on_spin Rik van Riel
2011-01-04 6:42 ` [RFC -v3 PATCH 0/3] directed yield for Pause Loop Exiting Mike Galbraith
2011-01-04 9:09 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-04 10:32 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-04 10:35 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-04 9:14 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-04 10:26 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-04 17:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1294164289.2016.186.camel@laptop \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox