From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>, tglx <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC -v3 PATCH 2/3] sched: add yield_to function
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 11:04:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1294221862.2016.218.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110105110837.B62A.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 11:39 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> After calling pthread_cond_signal(), T1 which cond_signal caller and T2
> which waked start to GIL grab race. But usually T1 is always win because
> lock variable is in T1's cpu cache. Why kernel and userland have so much
> different result? One of a reason is glibc doesn't have any ticket lock scheme.
The problem is that making locks strictly fair is that that sucks for
performance, iirc most futex ops are fifo-ordered when they his the
block path, but we do allow for lock-stealing.
Lock-stealing greatly improves performance since it avoids lots of
block/wakeup cycles, but it does make things unfair.
I'm not sure we have a futex option to disable lock-stealing, nor do I
think you really want to, performance suffers really badly.
[This btw is the reason why people reported a performance improvement
when they wrapped all mmap() calls in a pthread_mutex, the
rwsem_down_write() thing doesn't allow for lock-stealing since it needs
to be strict fifo-fair]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-05 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-03 21:26 [RFC -v3 PATCH 0/3] directed yield for Pause Loop Exiting Rik van Riel
2011-01-03 21:27 ` [RFC -v3 PATCH 1/3] kvm: keep track of which task is running a KVM vcpu Rik van Riel
2011-01-03 21:29 ` [RFC -v3 PATCH 2/3] sched: add yield_to function Rik van Riel
2011-01-04 1:51 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-04 6:14 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-01-04 12:03 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-05 2:39 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-01-05 8:35 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-05 8:40 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-01-05 9:08 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-05 9:30 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-01-05 9:34 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-05 10:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-05 10:04 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-01-04 17:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-05 3:17 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-01-04 14:28 ` Hillf Danton
2011-01-04 16:41 ` Hillf Danton
2011-01-04 16:44 ` Rik van Riel
2011-01-04 16:51 ` Hillf Danton
2011-01-04 16:54 ` Rik van Riel
2011-01-04 17:02 ` Hillf Danton
2011-01-04 17:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-04 17:12 ` Hillf Danton
2011-01-04 17:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-04 17:53 ` Rik van Riel
2011-01-04 18:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-04 18:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-04 18:53 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-05 16:57 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-05 17:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-05 17:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-07 5:29 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-13 3:02 ` Rik van Riel
2011-01-13 3:26 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-13 5:08 ` Rik van Riel
2011-01-06 14:33 ` Hillf Danton
2011-01-05 17:10 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-05 17:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-05 17:19 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-05 17:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-05 17:35 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-05 17:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-06 3:49 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-03 21:30 ` [RFC -v3 PATCH 3/3] Subject: kvm: use yield_to instead of sleep in kvm_vcpu_on_spin Rik van Riel
2011-01-04 6:42 ` [RFC -v3 PATCH 0/3] directed yield for Pause Loop Exiting Mike Galbraith
2011-01-04 9:09 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-04 10:32 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-04 10:35 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-04 9:14 ` Avi Kivity
2011-01-04 10:26 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-01-04 17:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1294221862.2016.218.camel@laptop \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox