public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, asias.hejun@gmail.com, gorcunov@gmail.com,
	prasadjoshi124@gmail.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] kvm tools: Add debug feature to test the IO thread
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 20:04:27 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1303232667.6697.5.camel@stimpy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTika=dKNQxU2yXNgG6Vs-wO98Dp9fA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 19:52 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Add --debug-io-delay-cycles and --debug-io-delay-amount to delay the completion of IO requests within virtio-blk.
> > This feature allows to verify and debug the threading within virtio-blk.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
> 
> Well, to be honest, I'm not convinced we need both of these. Isn't
> --debug-io-delay=<msec> enough for our use?

This came up during our testing.

Ingo suggested a large delay so we could easily see the results of
threading. The problem we encountered was that having a delay right from
the beginning will make the guest kernel take a rather long time to boot
and would make actually testing the threading impossible.

I've added a delay before the activation of the I/O request completion
delay to give the tester/debugger enough time to boot into the guest and
prepare anything needed for the test.

Making it a constant is also rather hard because different kernels can
take a very different amount of I/O requests to boot. Take the simple
example of a whether fsck was running during the boot or not.

-- 

Sasha.


  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-19 17:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-18 13:02 [PATCH 1/4] kvm tools: Thread virtio-blk Sasha Levin
2011-04-18 13:02 ` [PATCH 2/4] kvm tools: Use virtio_blk_parameters to configure virtio-blk Sasha Levin
2011-04-18 13:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] kvm tools: Add debug feature to test the IO thread Sasha Levin
2011-04-19 16:52   ` Pekka Enberg
2011-04-19 17:04     ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2011-04-19 17:11       ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-19 23:10         ` Asias He
2011-04-20  5:41           ` Pekka Enberg
2011-04-20  8:54             ` Ingo Molnar
2011-04-18 13:02 ` [PATCH 4/4] kvm tools: Complete missing segments in a iov op using regular op Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1303232667.6697.5.camel@stimpy \
    --to=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
    --cc=asias.hejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=prasadjoshi124@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox