From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Woodhouse Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] intel-iommu: Fix use after release during device attach Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:42:58 +0100 Message-ID: <1303400579.23521.2.camel@i7.infradead.org> References: <4CCFB84F.6050102@web.de> <201011021531.22886.sheng@linux.intel.com> <4CDFA96D.1060301@web.de> <4D01E677.5070702@siemens.com> <20101210184402.GE4040@sequoia.sous-sol.org> <4D22F9A4.3050807@web.de> <4DB023C7.5070007@siemens.com> <1303396097.3050.4.camel@x201> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jan Kiszka , Chris Wright , kvm , Marcelo Tosatti , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" , Avi Kivity To: Alex Williamson Return-path: Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:41676 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750915Ab1DUPnG (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Apr 2011 11:43:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1303396097.3050.4.camel@x201> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 15:28 +0100, Alex Williamson wrote: > I've been wondering the exact same thing. My last patch took weeks of > prodding, finally went into the maintainer's tree without > acknowledgment, and there's hardly been any activity there to suggest > a pull request for 2.6.39 is going to happen. David, are you still > interested in maintaining this code? Thanks, Yes, sorry, I've been somewhat snowed under with various things. This patch has been in my tree for a while, and I've just merged one more patch which is outstanding and sent Linus a pull request. -- dwmw2