From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Shirley Ma <mashirle@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 2/6 net-next] netdevice.h: Add zero-copy flag in
 netdevice
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 10:00:28 -0700
Message-ID: <1305738028.32080.66.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <1305671318.10756.49.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <20110518103819.GL7589@redhat.com>
	 <BANLkTimc1RbC3uQsra1HUvS_Trg63iMWGA@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20110518111734.GO7589@redhat.com>
	 <BANLkTi=g_PFfS5653K8ZoQ2Jhp8DhCV1hg@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1305729507.32080.6.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <20110518154746.GA21378@redhat.com>
	 <1305734857.32080.53.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <20110518163633.GB22001@redhat.com>
	 <1305737140.32080.59.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <20110518165138.GD22001@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_Miros=C5=82aw?= <mirqus@gmail.com>,
	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110518165138.GD22001@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 19:51 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > Yes, I agree.  I think for tcpdump, we really need to copy the
> data
> > > anyway, to avoid guest changing it in between.  So we do that and
> then
> > > use the copy everywhere, release the old one. Hmm? 
> > 
> > Yes. Old one use zerocopy, new one use copy data.
> > 
> > Thanks
> > Shirley
> 
> No, that's wrong, as they might become different with a
> malicious guest. As long as we copied already, lets realease
> the data and have everyone use the copy. 

Ok, I will patch pskb_expand_head to test it out.

Shirley