public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: john@jfloren.net, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
	asias.hejun@gmail.com, gorcunov@gmail.com,
	prasadjoshi124@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] kvm tools: Add optional parameter used in ioport callbacks
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 12:38:56 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1306402736.3065.14.camel@lappy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTim2HSTU_Geg6UV=21b+D3GkenX93w@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 12:20 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > I've wanted to keep the original interface clean, Most of the IO port
> >> > users don't (and probably won't) require a parameter.
> >>
> >> Well now struct ioport_operations isn't very clean is it - or the code
> >> that needs to determine which function pointer to call?-)
> >
> > struct ioport_operations is a bit more messy, but it's one spot instead
> > of adding a 'parameter' to each module that doesn't really need it.
> >
> > My assumption is that most ioport users now and in the future won't need
> > it, it just solves several special cases more easily (multiple devices
> > which share same handling functions).
> 
> Hey, that's not an excuse to make struct ioport_operations 'bit
> messy'! Look at any kernel code that uses ops like we do here and you
> will see we don't do APIs like this.
> 
> One option here is to rename 'struct ioport_entry' to 'struct ioport'
> and pass a pointer to that as the first argument to all of the ops.
> That's what most APIs in the kernel do anyway.

Why do it like that? this way users of the callback functions will need
to know the internal structure of struct ioport_entry.

-- 

Sasha.


  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-26  9:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-26  6:42 [PATCH v2 1/8] kvm tools: Add optional parameter used in ioport callbacks Sasha Levin
2011-05-26  6:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] kvm tools: Add basic ioport dynamic allocation Sasha Levin
2011-05-26  6:42 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] kvm tools: Use ioport context to control blk devices Sasha Levin
2011-05-26  6:42 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] kvm tools: Add support for multiple virtio-rng devices Sasha Levin
2011-05-26  6:42 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] kvm tools: Use dynamic IO port allocation in vesa driver Sasha Levin
2011-05-26  6:42 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] kvm tools: Use dynamic IO port allocation in 9p driver Sasha Levin
2011-05-26  6:42 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] kvm tools: Use dynamic IO port allocation in virtio-console Sasha Levin
2011-05-26  6:42 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] kvm tools: Use dynamic IO port allocation in virtio-net Sasha Levin
2011-05-26  8:53 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] kvm tools: Add optional parameter used in ioport callbacks Pekka Enberg
2011-05-26  9:02   ` Sasha Levin
2011-05-26  9:04     ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-26  9:14       ` Sasha Levin
2011-05-26  9:20         ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-26  9:38           ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2011-05-26  9:43             ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-26  9:49               ` Pekka Enberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1306402736.3065.14.camel@lappy \
    --to=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
    --cc=asias.hejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=john@jfloren.net \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=prasadjoshi124@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox