Re: [PATCH 4/6] kvm tools: Add rwlock wrapper

[Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>]

On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 19:02 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Thu, 26 May 2011, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > Adds a rwlock wrapper which like the mutex wrapper makes rwlock calls
> > similar to their kernel counterparts.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
> 
> There's no explanation why a mutex isn't sufficient. The pthread locking 
> primitives aren't all that great in practice so unless you have some 
> correctness issue that requires a rwlock or some numbers, I'd prefer you 
> go for a mutex.

I've added some rwlocks because of what Ingo said yesterday about
adding/removing devices after the first initialization phase.

Take MMIO lock for example: Since we can now run SMP guests, we may have
multiple MMIO exits (one from each VCPU thread). Each of those exits
leads to searching the MMIO rbtree.

We can use a mutex to lock it, but it just means that those threads will
be blocked there instead of concurrently searching the MMIO tree which
makes the search linear instead of parallel.

It's hard to bring 'real' numbers at this stage because the only 'real'
device we have which uses MMIO is the VESA driver, and we can't really
simulate many VCPUs writing to it :)

-- 

Sasha.