From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pekka Enberg Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] kvm tools: Add ioeventfd support Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 14:55:41 +0300 Message-ID: <1306670141.16757.155.camel@jaguar> References: <1306513120-28794-1-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com> <20110527165257.GA4356@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Sasha Levin , john@jfloren.net, kvm@vger.kernel.org, asias.hejun@gmail.com, gorcunov@gmail.com, prasadjoshi124@gmail.com To: Ingo Molnar Return-path: Received: from filtteri2.pp.htv.fi ([213.243.153.185]:45307 "EHLO filtteri2.pp.htv.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751818Ab1E2Lzn (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 May 2011 07:55:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110527165257.GA4356@elte.hu> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 18:52 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > In such cases it would *really* be useful, in addition of dumping > 80-100 raw numbers to summarize results and compare them for the > reader, as i suspect you've done already? Please don't keep it a > secret and don't force the reader to compare two tables with 80+ raw > numbers! :-) > > Something like: > > " In short, block writes are 20% faster, block reads are 19.9% > faster, seeks got 16% faster. None of the operations got slower. " Definitely. I forgot to update the changelog but please remember to provide *both* a summary and as much as the raw data as is reasonable in the patch description. Pekka