From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] kvm tools: Use ioeventfd in virtio-net Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 19:32:57 +0300 Message-ID: <1306859577.25406.19.camel@lappy> References: <1306513120-28794-1-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com> <1306513120-28794-3-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com> <4DE42DEE.8070906@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Asias He , john@jfloren.net, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, gorcunov@gmail.com, prasadjoshi124@gmail.com To: Pekka Enberg Return-path: Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:47756 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757399Ab1EaQd2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 May 2011 12:33:28 -0400 Received: by wya21 with SMTP id 21so3444378wya.19 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 09:33:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 10:18 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 2:53 AM, Asias He wrote: > > TAP based network performance with ioeventfd > > Heh, so how did it look _before_ ioeventfd? Did performance improve > and how much? Asias, did you use TCP or UDP values as bandwidth in your previous test? -- Sasha.