From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci-assign: Do not reset the device unless the kernel supports it
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 12:46:13 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1307472373.5901.33.camel@x201> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DEDDDDE.4010209@web.de>
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 10:14 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-06-07 10:06, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 06/07/2011 01:04 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> On 2011-06-06 23:48, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 23:30 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> >> From: Jan Kiszka<jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
> >> >>
> >> >> At least kernels 2.6.38 and 2.6.39 do not properly support issuing a
> >> >> reset on an assigned device and corrupt its config space. Prevent
> >> >> this by checking for a host kernel with the required support,
> >> tagged by
> >> >> the to-be-introduced KVM_CAP_DEVICE_RESET.
> >> >
> >> > Wouldn't it be easier just to revert ed78661f in 2.6.39 stable? I
> >> guess
> >> > we don't have an option to do that for .38 since stable is done there,
> >> > but there are also some intel-iommu breakages that won't make
> >> stable for
> >> > that release. It seems like the userspace invoked reset resolves
> >> known,
> >> > demonstrable issues of devices continuing to DMA into guest memory
> >> while
> >> > ed78661f is mostly a theoretical change.
> >>
> >> Easier would be this patch. But I don't mind reverting the problematic
> >> commit in 39, whatever is preferred. We should just resolve the issue
> >> finally.
> >
> > Kernel problems should be solved in the kernel (with exceptions of
> > course, but don't see the need here).
>
> Then please file a revert for stable ASAP.
How's this? For stable only or course. Thanks,
Alex
Revert "KVM: Save/restore state of assigned PCI device"
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
This reverts ed78661f2614d3c9f69c23e280db3bafdabdf5bb as it assumes
the saved PCI state will remain valid for the entire length of time
that it is attached to a guest. This fails when userspace makes use
of the pci-sysfs reset interface, which invalidates the saved device
state, leaving nothing to be restored after the device is reset on
de-assignment. This leaves the device in an unusable state.
3.0.0 will add an interface for KVM to save the PCI state in a
buffer unaffected by other callers of pci_reset_function(), but the
most appropriate stable fix seems to be reverting this change since
the original assumption about the device saved state persisting is
incorrect.
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
---
virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c | 5 +----
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c b/virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c
index ae72ae6..e3f1235 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c
@@ -197,8 +197,7 @@ static void kvm_free_assigned_device(struct kvm *kvm,
{
kvm_free_assigned_irq(kvm, assigned_dev);
- __pci_reset_function(assigned_dev->dev);
- pci_restore_state(assigned_dev->dev);
+ pci_reset_function(assigned_dev->dev);
pci_release_regions(assigned_dev->dev);
pci_disable_device(assigned_dev->dev);
@@ -515,7 +514,6 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_assign_device(struct kvm *kvm,
}
pci_reset_function(dev);
- pci_save_state(dev);
match->assigned_dev_id = assigned_dev->assigned_dev_id;
match->host_segnr = assigned_dev->segnr;
@@ -546,7 +544,6 @@ out:
mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
return r;
out_list_del:
- pci_restore_state(dev);
list_del(&match->list);
pci_release_regions(dev);
out_disable:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-07 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-06 21:30 [PATCH] pci-assign: Do not reset the device unless the kernel supports it Jan Kiszka
2011-06-06 21:48 ` Alex Williamson
2011-06-06 22:04 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-06-07 8:06 ` Avi Kivity
2011-06-07 8:14 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-06-07 18:46 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2011-06-08 7:52 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-06-09 8:10 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1307472373.5901.33.camel@x201 \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox