From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] KVM-GST: adjust scheduler cpu power Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:54:27 +0200 Message-ID: <1309470867.12449.605.camel@twins> References: <1309361388-30163-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> <1309361388-30163-9-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rik van Riel , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Avi Kivity , Anthony Liguori , Eric B Munson To: Glauber Costa Return-path: Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:56489 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752072Ab1F3Vzd convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:55:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1309361388-30163-9-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 11:29 -0400, Glauber Costa wrote: > + return __touch_steal_time(is_idle, UINT_MAX, NULL); That wants to be ULLONG_MAX, because max_steal is a u64, with UINT_MAX the comparison: + if (steal > max_steal) Isn't true per-se and the compiler cannot optimize the branch away. Also, make sure it does indeed optimize that branch away, otherwise simply duplicate the code. This is on the very hottest scheduler paths, branches do count. Same for: + if (ticks) with ticks == NULL, make sure it never emits code for the above call. Ah, also, all that requires you strip that noinline crap you put on it, if it cannot inline, it cannot assume anything on the input and will this have to emit all this nonsense.