From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/9] KVM-GST: KVM Steal time accounting
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 23:54:31 +0200
Message-ID: <1309470871.12449.608.camel@twins>
References: <1309361388-30163-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com>
	 <1309361388-30163-8-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
	Eric B Munson <emunson@mgebm.net>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1309361388-30163-8-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 11:29 -0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> This patch accounts steal time time in kernel/sched.
> I kept it from last proposal, because I still see advantages
> in it: Doing it here will give us easier access from scheduler
> variables such as the cpu rq. The next patch shows an example of
> usage for it.
> 
> Since functions like account_idle_time() can be called from
> multiple places, not only account_process_tick(), steal time
> grabbing is repeated in each account function separatedely.
> 

That changelog is so going to frustrate someone trying to re-create your
thinking in a year's time. They really don't care about the last
proposals and the next patch.