From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/9] KVM-GST: KVM Steal time accounting
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 10:25:30 +0200
Message-ID: <1309508730.12449.630.camel@twins>
References: <1309361388-30163-1-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com>
	 <1309361388-30163-8-git-send-email-glommer@redhat.com>
	 <1309470872.12449.609.camel@twins>  <4E0D35E5.9080506@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
	Eric B Munson <emunson@mgebm.net>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <4E0D35E5.9080506@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 23:50 -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
> I was under the impression that the proper use of jump labels required 
> each label to be tied to a single location. If we make it inline, the 
> same key would point to multiple locations, and we would have trouble
> altering all of the locations. I might be wrong, of course. Isn't it the 
> case? 

Nope, you can have as many patch sites per key as you want.