public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Donald Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] device-assignment pci: correct pci config size default for cap version 2 endpoints
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 11:02:53 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1311267773.26867.7.camel@ul30vt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110721163733.661.22067.stgit@dddsys0.bos.redhat.com>

On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 12:39 -0400, Donald Dutile wrote:
> v2: do local boundary check with respect to legacy PCI header length,
>     and don't depend on it in pci_add_capability().
>   : fix compilation, and change else>2 to simple else for all other cases.
> 
> Doing device assignement using a PCIe device with it's
> PCI Cap structure at offset 0xcc showed a problem in
> the default size mapped for this cap-id.
> 
> The failure caused a corruption which might have gone unnoticed
> otherwise.
> 
> Fix assigned_device_pci_cap_init() to set the default
> size of PCIe Cap structure (cap-id 0x10) to 0x34 instead of 0x3c.
> 0x34 is default, min, for endpoint device with a cap version of 2.
> 
> Add check in assigned_devic_pci_cap_init() to ensure
> size of Cap structure doesn't exceed legacy PCI header space,
> which is where it must fit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Donald Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>
> cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> ---
> 
>  hw/device-assignment.c |   19 ++++++++++++++++---
>  1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/device-assignment.c b/hw/device-assignment.c
> index 36ad6b0..6bb8af7 100644
> --- a/hw/device-assignment.c
> +++ b/hw/device-assignment.c
> @@ -1419,21 +1419,34 @@ static int assigned_device_pci_cap_init(PCIDevice *pci_dev)
>      }
>  
>      if ((pos = pci_find_cap_offset(pci_dev, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP, 0))) {
> -        uint8_t version;
> +        uint8_t version, size;
>          uint16_t type, devctl, lnkcap, lnksta;
>          uint32_t devcap;
> -        int size = 0x3c; /* version 2 size */
>  
>          version = pci_get_byte(pci_dev->config + pos + PCI_EXP_FLAGS);
>          version &= PCI_EXP_FLAGS_VERS;
>          if (version == 1) {
>              size = 0x14;
> -        } else if (version > 2) {
> +        } else if (version == 2) {
> +            /* don't include slot cap/stat/ctrl 2 regs; only support endpoints */
> +            size = 0x34;
> +        } else {
>              fprintf(stderr, "Unsupported PCI express capability version %d\n",
>                      version);
>              return -EINVAL;
>          }
>  
> +	/* make sure cap struct resides in legacy hdr space */
> +	if (size > PCI_CONFIG_SPACE_SIZE - pos) {
> +            fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: %04x:%02x:%02x.%x "
> +                    "Attempt to add PCI Cap Structure 0x%x at offset 0x%x,"
> +                    "size 0x%x, which exceeds legacy PCI config space 0x%x\n",
> +                    pci_find_domain(pci_dev->bus), pci_bus_num(pci_dev->bus),
> +                    PCI_SLOT(pci_dev->devfn), PCI_FUNC(pci_dev->devfn),
> +                    PCI_CAP_ID_EXP, pos, size, PCI_CONFIG_SPACE_SIZE);
> +            return -EINVAL;
> +        }
> +

This is crazy, why would we only test this for PCI_CAP_ID_EXP?  If the
test is going to go in device-assignment, we need to wrap
pci_add_capability and do it for all callers.  However, maybe we can get
MST to take it in pci_add_capability() if we make the test more
complete...  something like:

if ((pos < 256 && size > 256 - pos) ||
    (pci_config_size() > 256 && pos > 256 &&
     size > pci_config_size() - pos)) {
   ... badness

Thanks,

Alex

>          if ((ret = pci_add_capability(pci_dev, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP,
>                                        pos, size)) < 0) {
>              return ret;
> 




  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-21 17:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-21 16:39 [PATCH V2] device-assignment pci: correct pci config size default for cap version 2 endpoints Donald Dutile
2011-07-21 17:02 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2011-07-21 17:52   ` Don Dutile
2011-07-24  8:36   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-07-25 20:14     ` Alex Williamson
2011-07-26 11:42       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-07-26 15:45         ` Alex Williamson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1311267773.26867.7.camel@ul30vt \
    --to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox