From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Native Linux KVM tool for 3.1 Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:51:40 +0300 Message-ID: <1311598300.10256.10.camel@lappy> References: <4E2CA6DE.4040900@web.de> <20110725075305.GA32294@elte.hu> <0EAA5203-D598-4CBA-B8D2-AB371A7689A9@suse.de> <4E2D65D7.6030407@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Pekka Enberg , Alexander Graf , Ingo Molnar , Jan Kiszka , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, gorcunov@gmail.com, asias.hejun@gmail.com, prasadjoshi124@gmail.com To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:64295 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751189Ab1GYMwO (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jul 2011 08:52:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4E2D65D7.6030407@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 15:47 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 07/25/2011 03:45 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: > > >> And don't get this the wrong way either, I'm not hostile against other > > >> operating systems, but I simply am not interested enough in them to > > >> spend my time improving them. > > > > > > Then kvm-tool is about as useful as Mac-on-Linux. Why don't we have MoL user land in the kernel? I even added support for KVM to it about a year ago. So all I need to do is change it to the kernel coding style, add some dependencies on kernel headers and I'm good for a pull request? > > > > Oh, I dunno - have you tried that? If you're interested in sending a > > patch against tools/kvm that adds KVM-based support to Mac, I'm happy > > to review it and consider for inclusion. ;-) > > The patch will be a lot bigger than tools/kvm itself. > But it would be as a single patch series which includes kvm and tools/kvm :) -- Sasha.