From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Implement support for the RH bit
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 23:05:00 +0300
Message-ID: <1314907500.3992.15.camel@lappy>
References: <1314893135-3839-1-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com>
	 <20110901174528.GA26451@redhat.com> <1314903592.3992.9.camel@lappy>
	 <20110901193152.GB26451@redhat.com> <1314907111.3992.14.camel@lappy>
	 <20110901200303.GC26451@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:64559 "EHLO
	mail-ww0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750786Ab1IAUFJ (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 1 Sep 2011 16:05:09 -0400
Received: by wwe5 with SMTP id 5so1578339wwe.1
        for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 13:05:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20110901200303.GC26451@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 23:03 +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 10:58:31PM +0300, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > By "actual addressing model" I meant checking the ICR of of each APIC to
> > see if we should address it logically or physically.
> > 
> This is definitely not what ICR of each APIC is about.

Thats what I understood from section 10.6.2 in the spec.

-- 

Sasha.