From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] KVM: x86 emulator: merge the two emulate_1op_rax_rdx implementations
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 16:41:39 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1315402900-8766-6-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1315402900-8766-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com>
We have two emulate-with-extended-accumulator implementations: once
which expect traps (_ex) and one which doesn't (plain). Drop the
plain implementation and always use the one which expects traps;
it will simply return 0 in the _ex argument and we can happily ignore
it.
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 64 +++++++++++------------------------------------
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
index a0dd13f..cb8dcb7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
@@ -322,21 +322,7 @@ struct gprefix {
} \
} while (0)
-#define __emulate_1op_rax_rdx(_op, _src, _rax, _rdx, _eflags, _suffix) \
- do { \
- unsigned long _tmp; \
- \
- __asm__ __volatile__ ( \
- _PRE_EFLAGS("0", "4", "1") \
- _op _suffix " %5; " \
- _POST_EFLAGS("0", "4", "1") \
- : "=m" (_eflags), "=&r" (_tmp), \
- "+a" (_rax), "+d" (_rdx) \
- : "i" (EFLAGS_MASK), "m" ((_src).val), \
- "a" (_rax), "d" (_rdx)); \
- } while (0)
-
-#define __emulate_1op_rax_rdx_ex(_op, _src, _rax, _rdx, _eflags, _suffix, _ex) \
+#define __emulate_1op_rax_rdx(_op, _src, _rax, _rdx, _eflags, _suffix, _ex) \
do { \
unsigned long _tmp; \
\
@@ -358,46 +344,24 @@ struct gprefix {
} while (0)
/* instruction has only one source operand, destination is implicit (e.g. mul, div, imul, idiv) */
-#define emulate_1op_rax_rdx(_op, _src, _rax, _rdx, _eflags) \
+#define emulate_1op_rax_rdx(_op, _src, _rax, _rdx, _eflags, _ex) \
do { \
switch((_src).bytes) { \
case 1: \
__emulate_1op_rax_rdx(_op, _src, _rax, _rdx, \
- _eflags, "b"); \
+ _eflags, "b", _ex); \
break; \
case 2: \
__emulate_1op_rax_rdx(_op, _src, _rax, _rdx, \
- _eflags, "w"); \
+ _eflags, "w", _ex); \
break; \
case 4: \
__emulate_1op_rax_rdx(_op, _src, _rax, _rdx, \
- _eflags, "l"); \
- break; \
- case 8: \
- ON64(__emulate_1op_rax_rdx(_op, _src, _rax, _rdx, \
- _eflags, "q")); \
- break; \
- } \
- } while (0)
-
-#define emulate_1op_rax_rdx_ex(_op, _src, _rax, _rdx, _eflags, _ex) \
- do { \
- switch((_src).bytes) { \
- case 1: \
- __emulate_1op_rax_rdx_ex(_op, _src, _rax, _rdx, \
- _eflags, "b", _ex); \
- break; \
- case 2: \
- __emulate_1op_rax_rdx_ex(_op, _src, _rax, _rdx, \
- _eflags, "w", _ex); \
- break; \
- case 4: \
- __emulate_1op_rax_rdx_ex(_op, _src, _rax, _rdx, \
- _eflags, "l", _ex); \
+ _eflags, "l", _ex); \
break; \
case 8: ON64( \
- __emulate_1op_rax_rdx_ex(_op, _src, _rax, _rdx, \
- _eflags, "q", _ex)); \
+ __emulate_1op_rax_rdx(_op, _src, _rax, _rdx, \
+ _eflags, "q", _ex)); \
break; \
} \
} while (0)
@@ -1718,18 +1682,20 @@ static int em_grp3(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
emulate_1op(ctxt, "neg");
break;
case 4: /* mul */
- emulate_1op_rax_rdx("mul", ctxt->src, *rax, *rdx, ctxt->eflags);
+ emulate_1op_rax_rdx("mul", ctxt->src, *rax, *rdx,
+ ctxt->eflags, de);
break;
case 5: /* imul */
- emulate_1op_rax_rdx("imul", ctxt->src, *rax, *rdx, ctxt->eflags);
+ emulate_1op_rax_rdx("imul", ctxt->src, *rax, *rdx,
+ ctxt->eflags, de);
break;
case 6: /* div */
- emulate_1op_rax_rdx_ex("div", ctxt->src, *rax, *rdx,
- ctxt->eflags, de);
+ emulate_1op_rax_rdx("div", ctxt->src, *rax, *rdx,
+ ctxt->eflags, de);
break;
case 7: /* idiv */
- emulate_1op_rax_rdx_ex("idiv", ctxt->src, *rax, *rdx,
- ctxt->eflags, de);
+ emulate_1op_rax_rdx("idiv", ctxt->src, *rax, *rdx,
+ ctxt->eflags, de);
break;
default:
return X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE;
--
1.7.6.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-07 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-07 13:41 [PATCH 0/6] Some emulator cleanups Avi Kivity
2011-09-07 13:41 ` [PATCH 1/6] KVM: x86 emulator: simplify emulate_2op_SrcV() Avi Kivity
2011-09-07 13:41 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: x86 emulator: simplify emulate_2op_cl() Avi Kivity
2011-09-07 13:41 ` [PATCH 3/6] " Avi Kivity
2011-09-07 13:41 ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: x86 emulator: simplify emulate_1op() Avi Kivity
2011-09-07 13:41 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2011-09-07 13:41 ` [PATCH 6/6] KVM: x86 emulator: simplify emulate_1op_rax_rdx() Avi Kivity
2011-09-09 16:20 ` [PATCH 0/6] Some emulator cleanups Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1315402900-8766-6-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox