From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 7/9] KVM: Expose the architectural performance monitoring CPUID leaf Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 15:09:46 +0100 Message-ID: <1320674987.18053.39.camel@twins> References: <1320323618-10375-1-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com> <1320323618-10375-8-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, avi@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, acme@ghostprotocols.net To: Gleb Natapov Return-path: Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:43661 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753534Ab1KGOMM convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2011 09:12:12 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1320323618-10375-8-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 14:33 +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote: > + case 0xa: { /* Architectural Performance Monitoring */ > + struct x86_pmu_capability cap; > + > + perf_get_x86_pmu_capability(&cap); > + > + /* > + * Only support guest architectural pmu on a host > + * with architectural pmu. > + */ > + if (!cap.version) > + memset(&cap, 0, sizeof(cap)); > + > + entry->eax = min(cap.version, 2) > + | (cap.num_counters_gp << 8) > + | (cap.bit_width_gp << 16) > + | (cap.events_mask_len << 24); > + entry->ebx = cap.events_mask; > + entry->ecx = 0; > + entry->edx = cap.num_counters_fixed > + | (cap.bit_width_fixed << 5); > + break; > + } would it make sense to use the cpuid10_e[ad]x unions to fill out that data?