From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/9] KVM: Expose a version 2 architectural PMU to a
 guests
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 15:22:05 +0100
Message-ID: <1320675725.18053.40.camel@twins>
References: <1320323618-10375-1-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com>
	 <1320323618-10375-3-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, avi@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
	acme@ghostprotocols.net, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1320323618-10375-3-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 14:33 +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ config KVM
>         select KVM_MMIO
>         select TASKSTATS
>         select TASK_DELAY_ACCT
> +       select PERF_EVENTS 

Do you really want to make that an unconditional part of KVM? I know we
can't currently build x86 without perf due to that hw breakpoint
trainwreck, but people were actually wanting to solve that.