From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [libvirt] (no subject)
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 19:56:46 +0200
Message-ID: <1323539806.1428.240.camel@jaguar>
References: <1321012626-31713-1-git-send-email-jyang@redhat.com>
	 <20111206143813.GA7937@redhat.com>  <4EE1FF5B.9070706@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>, libvir-list@redhat.com,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, levinsasha928@gmail.com, gorcunov@gmail.com,
	mingo@elte.hu, asias.hejun@gmail.com
To: Osier Yang <jyang@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from courier.cs.helsinki.fi ([128.214.9.1]:38272 "EHLO
	mail.cs.helsinki.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750941Ab1LJR4t (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 10 Dec 2011 12:56:49 -0500
In-Reply-To: <4EE1FF5B.9070706@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 20:30 +0800, Osier Yang wrote:
> By the way, nobody is interested in kvmtool privodes a way to for 
> external apps to get the capabilities? Do we still want to suffer
> from parsing the capabilities ourselves in future just like what
> we do for qemu? :-)

I think the feature makes sense especially if it simplifies libvirt.

			Pekka