kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] RFC: PCI using capabilitities
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 14:53:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1323607992.4063.9.camel@lappy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111211124703.GE11504@redhat.com>

On Sun, 2011-12-11 at 14:47 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> First, I'd like to answer your questions from the PCI side.
> Look for PCI rules in the PCI spec.
> You will notices that a write is required to be able to
> pass a read request. It might also pass read completion.
> A read request will not pass a write request.
> There's more or less no ordering between different types of transactions
> (memory versus io/configuration).
> 
> That's wrt to the question you asked.
> 
> But this is not your setup: you have a single vcpu so
> you will not initiate a write (select vq) until you get
> a read completion.
> 
> So what you are really describing is this setup: guest reads a value,
> gets the response, then writes out another one, and kvm tool reports the
> write before the read. 

No, it's exactly the opposite. Guest writes a value first and then reads
one (writes queue_select and reads queue_address) and kvm tool reporting
the read before the write.

I must add here that the kvm tool doesn't do anything fancy with simple
IO/MMIO. Theres no thread games or anything similar there. The vcpu
thread is doing all the IO/MMIO work.

-- 

Sasha.


      reply	other threads:[~2011-12-11 12:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-08 10:22 [PATCH 0/11] RFC: PCI using capabilitities Rusty Russell
2011-12-08 10:30 ` [RFC 1/11] virtio: use u32, not bitmap for struct virtio_device's features Rusty Russell
2011-12-08 10:32 ` [PATCH 0/11] RFC: PCI using capabilitities Sasha Levin
2011-12-08 15:37 ` Sasha Levin
2011-12-09  6:17   ` Rusty Russell
2011-12-10 21:32     ` Sasha Levin
2011-12-11  9:05   ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-11 10:03     ` Sasha Levin
2011-12-11 12:30       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-12-11 12:48         ` Sasha Levin
2011-12-11 12:47   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-12-11 12:53     ` Sasha Levin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1323607992.4063.9.camel@lappy \
    --to=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).