From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sasha Levin Subject: Re: 5x slower guest disk performance with virtio disk Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 19:16:22 +0200 Message-ID: <1323969382.3992.21.camel@lappy> References: <20111215164434.IsVHDbflPT5f2Ac8ivIKgk@consulting.lsexperts.de> <4EEA2683.8080206@interlinx.bc.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org To: "Brian J. Murrell" Return-path: Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f46.google.com ([209.85.215.46]:38634 "EHLO mail-lpp01m010-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759004Ab1LORQ3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:16:29 -0500 Received: by lagp5 with SMTP id p5so1096617lag.19 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:16:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4EEA2683.8080206@interlinx.bc.ca> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 11:55 -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > So, about 2/3 of host speed now -- which is much better. Is 2/3 about > normal or should I be looking for more? aio=native Thats the qemu setting, I'm not sure where libvirt hides that. -- Sasha.