From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [RFC 01/12] kvm tools: Split kvm_cmd_run into init, work and uninit Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 12:09:26 +0200 Message-ID: <1324375766.22797.0.camel@lappy> References: <1324303114-5948-1-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com> <1324303114-5948-2-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com> <1324329976.1428.316.camel@jaguar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: mingo@elte.hu, gorcunov@gmail.com, asias.hejun@gmail.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Pekka Enberg Return-path: Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:48131 "EHLO mail-ww0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751387Ab1LTIKF (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Dec 2011 03:10:05 -0500 Received: by wgbdr13 with SMTP id dr13so12057741wgb.1 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2011 00:10:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1324329976.1428.316.camel@jaguar> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 23:26 +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 15:58 +0200, Sasha Levin wrote: > > +int kvm_cmd_run(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) > > +{ > > + int r, ret; > > + > > + r = kvm_cmd_run_init(argc, argv); > > + ret = kvm_cmd_run_work(); > > + r = kvm_cmd_run_uninit(ret); > > + > > + return ret; > > } > > What's going on here? Why do you bother saving 'r' if you don't use it > for anything? It was part of my plans to get kvm_cmd_run_{init, uninit} as a simple for(;;) through a init/uninit function pointer array, right now it's simply meaningless there. -- Sasha.