From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] use gettimeofday() instead of time() Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 09:43:12 +0200 Message-ID: <1325835792.4629.21.camel@lappy> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "aliguori@us.ibm.com" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "Shan, Haitao" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "avi@redhat.com" To: "Zhang, Yang Z" Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 07:37 +0000, Zhang, Yang Z wrote: > Please refer the patch zero for the description. Each patch should have description about what it does in the changelog, otherwise you're going to lose important information about the change. Furthermore, cover letters don't get merged at all, which means that if someone looks at this patch, he won't have anywhere to refer to to get the description (besides googling for the original mails I guess). -- Sasha.