public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
To: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Cc: kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Ronald Minnich <rminnich@google.com>
Subject: Re: Fix for bug that causes "KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID failed" errors.
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 02:40:04 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1327390804.32498.2.camel@lappy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPPXG1=v+-d91RWJ1jS7fpZrp9OTkHjowPRvCWXn2pz62vxtPw@mail.gmail.com>

The GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID bug has been fixed and shouldn't be happening
from v3.2 onwards.

Do you still see the issue in older versions?

On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 21:20 -0800, Gabe Black wrote:
> Sorry, forgot to add a subject.
> 
> Gabe
> 
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> wrote:
> > Hi, I think I've tracked down the bug that causes
> > "KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID failed: Argument list too long" errors when
> > using the kvm tool. Basically, this (possibly squished) code seems to
> > be to blame:
> >
> > case 0xd: {
> > int i;
> >
> > entry->flags |= KVM_CPUID_FLAG_SIGNIFCANT_INDEX;
> > for (i = 1; *nent < maxnent && i < 64; ++i) {
> > if (entry[i].eax == 0)
> > continue;
> > do_cpuid_1_ent(&entry[i], function, i);
> > entry[i].flags |=
> >      KVM_CPUID_FLAG_SIGNIFCANT_INDEX;
> > ++*nent;
> > }
> > break;
> > }
> >
> > You can see there's a check whether entry[i].eax is 0, but it isn't
> > until the next line that entry[i] is actually filled in. That means
> > that whether or not an entry is filled in for the 0xd function is
> > essentially random, and that can lead to the loss of valid entries. It
> > also means that nent may be incremented too often, and since all 64
> > entries are iterated over, that can fill up the available storage and
> > cause that error.
> >
> > I tested my theory by commenting out the if (100% failure rate) and
> > moving it after do_cpuid_1_ent (100% success rate). Since this is a
> > non-deterministic failure that isn't really conclusive, but I'm fairly
> > confident my fix is correct. I don't know exactly what your procedure
> > is for submitting patches, but one is attached.
> >
> > Gabe
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


-- 

Sasha.


  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-24  5:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-24  5:20 Fix for bug that causes "KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID failed" errors Gabe Black
2012-01-24  7:40 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2012-01-24 21:53   ` Gabe Black

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1327390804.32498.2.camel@lappy \
    --to=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
    --cc=gabeblack@chromium.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rminnich@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox