From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] kvm,x86: RCU based table free Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 15:31:32 +0200 Message-ID: <1338903092.28282.176.camel@twins> References: <20120604050223.4560.2874.stgit@abhimanyu.in.ibm.com> <20120604050822.4560.54662.stgit@abhimanyu.in.ibm.com> <87ehpuqam8.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <878vg1rjts.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1338901688.28282.168.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: Nikunj A Dadhania , "mingo@elte.hu" , "mtosatti@redhat.com" , "avi@redhat.com" , "raghukt@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "x86@kernel.org" , "jeremy@goop.org" , "vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "hpa@zytor.com" , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk To: Stefano Stabellini Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 14:26 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 18:34 +0530, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote: > > > PeterZ, is 7/7 alright to be picked? > > > > Yeah, I guess it is.. I haven't had time to rework my tlb series yet > > though. But these two patches together should make it work for x86. > > > > Good. Do you think they are OK for 3.5-rc2? Or is it better to wait for > 3.6? I wouldn't rush this stuff, but if you're up for it and can convince Linus that its all peachy you can try ;-)