From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Williamson Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] kvm: Extend irqfd to support level interrupts Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 08:27:51 -0600 Message-ID: <1340029671.24037.218.camel@bling.home> References: <20120616163230.15204.61075.stgit@bling.home> <4FDEE0A3.80900@redhat.com> <4FDEEC52.8080806@siemens.com> <4FDEF5CD.8090806@redhat.com> <20120618101156.GB23134@redhat.com> <4FDEFF75.6060104@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jan Kiszka , "mtosatti@redhat.com" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:1594 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751220Ab2FRO15 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:27:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4FDEFF75.6060104@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 13:14 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 06/18/2012 01:11 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > >> (vhost, > >> msi-less ivshmem clone)? > > > > I guess vhost can poll eventfd and reinject an interrupt. > > Of course to bypass qemu completely we also need to support reads over > > ioeventfd somehow. > > > > eventfd is not suitable for level triggered interrupts as far as I can > tell. It's about passing edges, and level interrupts aren't. We need > something like a pipe for communicating state (or just use KVM_IRQ_LINE). Isn't level just two edges with a state in between? Sure we may be unnecessarily de-asserting for brief periods, but for an external assigned device, we don't know whether it's unnecessary. Thanks, Alex