From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: avi@redhat.com
Cc: mst@redhat.com, gleb@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jan.kiszka@siemens.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] kvm: level irqfd and new eoifd
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:50:57 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1343083857.2229.323.camel@bling.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120720161841.15119.29653.stgit@bling.home>
On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 10:33 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> v6:
>
> So we're back to just the first two patches, unfortunately the
> diffstat got bigger though. The reason for that is that I discovered
> we don't do anything on release of an eoifd. We cleanup if the kvm
> vm is released, but we're dealing with a constrained resource of irq
> source IDs, so I think it's best that we cleanup to make sure those
> are returned. To do that we need nearly the same infrastructure as
> irqfd, we just only watch for POLLHUP. So while there's more code
> here, the structure and function names line up identically to irqfd.
>
> The other big change here is that KVM_IRQFD returns a token when
> setting up a level irqfd. We use this token to associate the eoifd
> with the right source. This means we have to put the struct
> _source_ids on a list so we can find them. This removes the weird
> interaction we were headed to where the eoifd is associated with
> the eventfd of the irqfd. There's potentially more flexibility for
> the future here too as we might come up with other interfaces that
> can return a source ID "key". Perhaps some future KVM_IRQFD will
> allow specifying a key for re-attaching. Anyway, the sequence
> Michael pointed out where an irqfd is de-assigned then re-assigned
> now results in a new key instead of leaving the user wondering if
> it re-associates back to the eoifd.
>
> Also added workqueue flushes on assign since releasing either
> object now results in a lazy release via workqueue. This ensures
> we re-claim any source IDs we can. Thanks,
FYI, I seem to have found a new locking issue in this version. I'll
send an update when I find it. Thanks,
Alex
> ---
>
> Alex Williamson (2):
> kvm: KVM_EOIFD, an eventfd for EOIs
> kvm: Extend irqfd to support level interrupts
>
>
> Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 32 ++-
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 3
> include/linux/kvm.h | 18 +
> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 17 +
> virt/kvm/eventfd.c | 463 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 11 +
> 6 files changed, 536 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-23 22:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-20 16:33 [PATCH v6 0/2] kvm: level irqfd and new eoifd Alex Williamson
2012-07-20 16:33 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] kvm: Extend irqfd to support level interrupts Alex Williamson
2012-07-20 16:33 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] kvm: KVM_EOIFD, an eventfd for EOIs Alex Williamson
2012-07-23 22:50 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1343083857.2229.323.camel@bling.home \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox