From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: Testing tracer wakeup_rt: .. no entries found ..FAILED!
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 08:43:47 -0400
Message-ID: <1343738627.27983.30.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
References: <20120724090330.GA9830@localhost>
	 <20120724090720.GA10434@localhost> <1343663105.3847.7.camel@fedora>
	 <20120731121759.GA17822@localhost> <5017D19B.5080806@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <5017D19B.5080806@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 15:37 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/31/2012 03:17 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > 
> > It's good to quickly get to the root cause :) Can we possibly detect
> > whether we are in a virtual machine and hence skip this particular
> > test case?
> 
> cpu_has(&boot_cpu, X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR)
> 

Yeah, but then it is still broken on non-x86 code (the test lives in
core kernel).

As it is just testing the events for wakeup, I could probably just add a
completion and force the other thread to just wait for it. I'll write up
a patch. But it wont make it in till 3.7.

-- Steve