From: Michael Wolf <mjw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, mtosatti@redhat.com, glommer@parallels.com,
mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] Add guest cpu_entitlement reporting
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:27:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1346102820.8623.32.camel@lambeau> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <503BD920.20603@redhat.com>
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 13:31 -0700, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 08/27/2012 01:23 PM, Michael Wolf wrote:
> > >
> > > How would a guest know what its entitlement is?
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Currently the Admin/management tool setting up the guests will put it on
> > the qemu commandline. From this it is passed via an ioctl to the host.
> > The guest will get the value from the host via a hypercall.
> >
> > In the future the host could try and do some of it automatically in some
> > cases.
>
> Seems to me it's a meaningless value for the guest. Suppose it is
> migrated to a host that is more powerful, and as a result its relative
> entitlement is reduced. The value needs to be adjusted.
This is why I chose to manage the value from the sysctl interface rather
than just have it stored as a value in /proc. Whatever tool was used to
migrate the vm could hopefully adjust the sysctl value on the guest.
>
> This is best taken care of from the host side.
Not sure what you are getting at here. If you are running in a cloud
environment, you purchase a VM with the understanding that you are
getting certain resources. As this type of user I don't believe you
have any access to the host to see this type of information. So the
user still wouldnt have a way to confirm that they are receiving what
they should be in the way of processor resources.
Would you please elaborate a little more on this?
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-27 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-23 23:14 [PATCH RFC 0/3] Add guest cpu_entitlement reporting Michael Wolf
2012-08-23 23:14 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] Add a sysctl interface to control and report the cpu entitlement setting Michael Wolf
2012-08-23 23:14 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] Add a hypercall to retrieve the cpu entitlement value from the host Michael Wolf
2012-08-23 23:14 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] Modify the amount of stealtime that the kernel reports via the /proc interface Michael Wolf
2012-08-24 4:53 ` [PATCH RFC 0/3] Add guest cpu_entitlement reporting Glauber Costa
2012-08-24 15:11 ` Michael Wolf
2012-08-25 23:36 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-27 15:50 ` Michael Wolf
2012-08-27 18:50 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-27 20:19 ` Michael Wolf
2012-08-27 20:51 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-27 18:55 ` Avi Kivity
2012-08-27 20:23 ` Michael Wolf
2012-08-27 20:31 ` Avi Kivity
2012-08-27 21:27 ` Michael Wolf [this message]
2012-08-27 21:41 ` Glauber Costa
2012-08-27 21:53 ` Michael Wolf
2012-08-27 21:52 ` Avi Kivity
2012-08-28 16:01 ` Anthony Liguori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1346102820.8623.32.camel@lambeau \
--to=mjw@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).