From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] kvm: Handle undercommitted guest case in PLE handler Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:14:26 +0200 Message-ID: <1348503266.11847.99.camel@twins> References: <20120921115942.27611.67488.sendpatchset@codeblue> <20120921120000.27611.71321.sendpatchset@codeblue> <505C654B.2050106@redhat.com> <505CA2EB.7050403@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <50607F1F.2040704@redhat.com> <5060851E.1030404@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: Raghavendra K T , Rik van Riel , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , Marcelo Tosatti , Srikar , "Nikunj A. Dadhania" , KVM , Jiannan Ouyang , chegu vinod , "Andrew M. Theurer" , LKML , Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Gleb Natapov To: Avi Kivity Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5060851E.1030404@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 18:06 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > > We would probably need a ->sched_exit() preempt notifier to make this > work. Peter, I know how much you love those, would it be acceptable? Where exactly do you want this? TASK_DEAD? or another exit?