From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: allow host header to be included even for !CONFIG_KVM Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:33:13 -0500 Message-ID: <1363894393.31522.20@snotra> References: <1363306426-27209-1-git-send-email-khilman@linaro.org> <1363823921.25034.35@snotra> <20130321072955.GO3889@redhat.com> <87ppyshlq5.fsf@linaro.org> <1363891354.31522.17@snotra> <20130321191600.GG9382@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; delsp=Yes; format=Flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: Kevin Hilman , Frederic Weisbecker , , Marcelo Tosatti , "open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MA..." , open list To: Gleb Natapov Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130321191600.GG9382@redhat.com> (from gleb@redhat.com on Thu Mar 21 14:16:00 2013) Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 03/21/2013 02:16:00 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 01:42:34PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > > On 03/21/2013 09:27:14 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote: > > >Gleb Natapov writes: > > > > > >> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 06:58:41PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > > >>> Why can't the entirety kvm_host.h be included regardless of > > >>> CONFIG_KVM, just like most other feature-specific headers? Why > > >>> can't the if/else just go around the functions that you want to > > >stub > > >>> out for non-KVM builds? > > >>> > > >> Kevin, > > >> > > >> What compilation failure this patch fixes? I presume something > ARM > > >> related. > > > > > >Not specficially ARM related, but more context tracking related > since > > >kernel/context_tracking.c pulls in kvm_host.h, which attempts to > > >pull in > > > which may not exist on some platforms. > > > > > >At least for ARM, KVM support was added in v3.9 so this patch can > > >probably be dropped since the non-KVM builds on ARM now work. But > any > > >platform without the will still be broken when trying > to > > >build the context tracker. > > > > Maybe other platforms should get empty asm/kvm*.h files. Is there > > anything from those files that the linux/kvm*.h headers need to > > build? > > > arch things. kvm_vcpu_arch, kvm_arch_memory_slot, kvm_arch etc. Could define them as empty structs. -Scott