From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [RFC][KVM][PATCH 1/1] kvm:ppc:booke-64: soft-disable interrupts Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 07:50:33 +1000 Message-ID: <1368222633.4524.53.camel@pasglop> References: <1368134856.654.11@snotra> <1368137220.3715.14.camel@pasglop> <20130510141213.GA31597@pek-khao-d1.corp.ad.wrs.com> <1368222580.4524.52.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Wood Scott-B07421 , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008 , "agraf@suse.de" , "kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org" , "tiejun.chen" , Bhushan Bharat-R65777 , Scott Wood , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" To: Kevin Hao Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1368222580.4524.52.camel@pasglop> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppe-linuxppc-embedded-2=m.gmane.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2013-05-11 at 07:49 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > I would keep the EE_EDGE bit definition. I have no objection to a gradual > approach however for the other one where we apply it as is now to enable > coreint while you do a rework to make it better :-) Note also that I generally don't apply FSL related patches directly, I rely on Kumar Gala picking them up so he's the one ultimately making that choice. Cheers, Ben.