From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM: PPC: Add support for IOMMU in-kernel handling Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 16:06:57 -0500 Message-ID: <1369256817.1374.29@scott-Lenovo-G560> References: <1369105607-20957-4-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; delsp=Yes; format=Flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: , , Alexey Kardashevskiy , Alexander Graf , , , Paul Mackerras , David Gibson To: Alexey Kardashevskiy Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1369105607-20957-4-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> (from aik@ozlabs.ru on Mon May 20 22:06:46 2013) Content-Disposition: inline Sender: kvm-ppc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 05/20/2013 10:06:46 PM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c > index 8465c2a..da6bf61 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c > @@ -396,6 +396,7 @@ int kvm_dev_ioctl_check_extension(long ext) > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c > break; > #endif > case KVM_CAP_SPAPR_MULTITCE: > + case KVM_CAP_SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU: > r = 1; > break; > default: Don't advertise SPAPR capabilities if it's not book3s -- and probably there's some additional limitation that would be appropriate. > @@ -1025,6 +1026,17 @@ long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp, > r = kvm_vm_ioctl_create_spapr_tce(kvm, &create_tce); > goto out; > } > + case KVM_CREATE_SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU: { > + struct kvm_create_spapr_tce_iommu create_tce_iommu; > + struct kvm *kvm = filp->private_data; > + > + r = -EFAULT; > + if (copy_from_user(&create_tce_iommu, argp, > + sizeof(create_tce_iommu))) > + goto out; > + r = kvm_vm_ioctl_create_spapr_tce_iommu(kvm, > &create_tce_iommu); > + goto out; > + } > #endif /* CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64 */ > > #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_64_HV > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h > index 5a2afda..450c82a 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h > @@ -667,6 +667,7 @@ struct kvm_ppc_smmu_info { > #define KVM_CAP_PPC_RTAS 91 > #define KVM_CAP_IRQ_XICS 92 > #define KVM_CAP_SPAPR_MULTITCE (0x110000 + 89) > +#define KVM_CAP_SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU (0x110000 + 90) Hmm... > @@ -939,6 +940,9 @@ struct kvm_s390_ucas_mapping { > #define KVM_GET_DEVICE_ATTR _IOW(KVMIO, 0xe2, struct > kvm_device_attr) > #define KVM_HAS_DEVICE_ATTR _IOW(KVMIO, 0xe3, struct > kvm_device_attr) > > +/* ioctl for SPAPR TCE IOMMU */ > +#define KVM_CREATE_SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU _IOW(KVMIO, 0xe4, struct > kvm_create_spapr_tce_iommu) Shouldn't this go under the vm ioctl section? -Scott