From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] KVM: PPC: Add support for multiple-TCE hcalls Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 18:37:05 +1000 Message-ID: <1371458225.21896.153.camel@pasglop> References: <1370412673-1345-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> <1370412673-1345-2-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> <0A6C24DE-1422-4ABA-A516-2B864F4714F8@suse.de> <51BEC0FE.4020805@ozlabs.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alexander Graf , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, David Gibson , Paul Mackerras , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org To: Alexey Kardashevskiy Return-path: In-Reply-To: <51BEC0FE.4020805@ozlabs.ru> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 17:55 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > David: > === > So, in the case of MULTITCE, that's not quite right. PR KVM can > emulate a PAPR system on a BookE machine, and there's no reason not to > allow TCE acceleration as well. We can't make it dependent on PAPR > mode being selected, because that's enabled per-vcpu, whereas these > capabilities are queried on the VM before the vcpus are created. > === > > Wrong? The capability just tells qemu the kernel supports it, it doesn't have to depend on PAPR mode, qemu can sort things out no ? Cheers, Ben.