From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>,
pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v5 03/14] nEPT: Fix wrong test in kvm_set_cr3
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 17:48:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1375282131-9713-4-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375282131-9713-1-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com>
From: Nadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com>
kvm_set_cr3() attempts to check if the new cr3 is a valid guest physical
address. The problem is that with nested EPT, cr3 is an *L2* physical
address, not an L1 physical address as this test expects.
As the comment above this test explains, it isn't necessary, and doesn't
correspond to anything a real processor would do. So this patch removes it.
Note that this wrong test could have also theoretically caused problems
in nested NPT, not just in nested EPT. However, in practice, the problem
was avoided: nested_svm_vmexit()/vmrun() do not call kvm_set_cr3 in the
nested NPT case, and instead set the vmcb (and arch.cr3) directly, thus
circumventing the problem. Additional potential calls to the buggy function
are avoided in that we don't trap cr3 modifications when nested NPT is
enabled. However, because in nested VMX we did want to use kvm_set_cr3()
(as requested in Avi Kivity's review of the original nested VMX patches),
we can't avoid this problem and need to fix it.
Reviewed-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Xinhao Xu <xinhao.xu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 11 -----------
1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index d2caeb9..e2fef8b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -682,17 +682,6 @@ int kvm_set_cr3(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr3)
*/
}
- /*
- * Does the new cr3 value map to physical memory? (Note, we
- * catch an invalid cr3 even in real-mode, because it would
- * cause trouble later on when we turn on paging anyway.)
- *
- * A real CPU would silently accept an invalid cr3 and would
- * attempt to use it - with largely undefined (and often hard
- * to debug) behavior on the guest side.
- */
- if (unlikely(!gfn_to_memslot(vcpu->kvm, cr3 >> PAGE_SHIFT)))
- return 1;
vcpu->arch.cr3 = cr3;
__set_bit(VCPU_EXREG_CR3, (ulong *)&vcpu->arch.regs_avail);
vcpu->arch.mmu.new_cr3(vcpu);
--
1.7.10.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-31 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-31 14:48 [PATCH v5 00/14] Nested EPT Gleb Natapov
2013-07-31 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 01/14] nEPT: Support LOAD_IA32_EFER entry/exit controls for L1 Gleb Natapov
2013-08-01 11:22 ` Orit Wasserman
2013-07-31 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 02/14] nEPT: Fix cr3 handling in nested exit and entry Gleb Natapov
2013-08-01 11:28 ` Orit Wasserman
2013-07-31 14:48 ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2013-08-01 12:07 ` [PATCH v5 03/14] nEPT: Fix wrong test in kvm_set_cr3 Orit Wasserman
2013-07-31 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 04/14] nEPT: Move common code to paging_tmpl.h Gleb Natapov
2013-07-31 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 05/14] nEPT: make guest's A/D bits depends on guest's paging mode Gleb Natapov
2013-08-01 6:51 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-07-31 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 06/14] nEPT: Support shadow paging for guest paging without A/D bits Gleb Natapov
2013-08-01 6:54 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-07-31 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 07/14] nEPT: Add EPT tables support to paging_tmpl.h Gleb Natapov
2013-08-01 7:00 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-01 7:10 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-01 7:18 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-01 7:31 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-01 7:42 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-01 7:51 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-01 7:56 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-01 11:05 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-01 11:07 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-31 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 08/14] nEPT: Redefine EPT-specific link_shadow_page() Gleb Natapov
2013-08-01 7:24 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-01 7:27 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-31 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 09/14] nEPT: Nested INVEPT Gleb Natapov
2013-07-31 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 10/14] nEPT: Add nEPT violation/misconfigration support Gleb Natapov
2013-08-01 8:31 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-01 8:45 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-01 11:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-01 11:47 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-01 12:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-01 12:14 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-01 13:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-01 13:20 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-31 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 11/14] nEPT: MMU context for nested EPT Gleb Natapov
2013-08-01 9:16 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-01 9:37 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-01 9:51 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-07-31 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 12/14] nEPT: Advertise EPT to L1 Gleb Natapov
2013-07-31 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 13/14] nEPT: Some additional comments Gleb Natapov
2013-07-31 14:48 ` [PATCH v5 14/14] nEPT: Miscelleneous cleanups Gleb Natapov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1375282131-9713-4-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com \
--to=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox