From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] KVM: PPC: reserve a capability number for multitce support Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:34:09 +1000 Message-ID: <1377588849.3819.114.camel@pasglop> References: <1375332272-22176-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> <1375332272-22176-3-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> <1376441474.4255.39.camel@pasglop> <20130826123753.GA22977@redhat.com> <1377577198.3819.102.camel@pasglop> <20130827064026.GB22899@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras , Alexander Graf , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, Alexey Kardashevskiy To: Gleb Natapov Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130827064026.GB22899@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-ppc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 09:40 +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > Thanks. Since it's not in a topic branch that I can pull, I'm going to > > just cherry-pick them. However, they are in your "queue" branch, not > > "next" branch. Should I still assume this is a stable branch and that > > the numbers aren't going to change ? > > > Queue will become next after I will test it and if test will fail the > commit hash may change, but since you are going to cherry-pick and this > does not preserve commit hash it does not matter. Right, as long as the actual cap and ioctl numbers remain stable :-) Cheers, Ben.