From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Wood Subject: Re: RFC: (re-)binding the VFIO platform driver to a platform device Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 14:17:16 -0500 Message-ID: <1380655036.10618.32.camel@snotra.buserror.net> References: <20131001133831.6e46e8e00e09d5d9079fde57@linaro.org> <1380654938.10618.30.camel@snotra.buserror.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , Greg Kroah-Hartman , , Alexander Graf , Alex Williamson , , Wood Scott-B07421 , Sethi Varun-B16395 , Bhushan Bharat-R65777 , Peter Maydell , Christoffer Dall , , To: Kim Phillips Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1380654938.10618.30.camel@snotra.buserror.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2013-10-01 at 14:15 -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > On Tue, 2013-10-01 at 13:38 -0500, Kim Phillips wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Santosh and I are having a problem figuring out how to enable binding > > (and re-binding) platform devices to a platform VFIO driver (see > > Antonis' WIP: [1]) in an upstream-acceptable manner. > > > > Binding platform drivers currently depends on a string match in the > > device node's compatible entry. On an arndale, one can currently > > rebind the same device to the same driver like so: > > > > echo 12ce0000.i2c > /sys/bus/platform/drivers/s3c-i2c/12ce0000.i2c/driver/unbind > > echo 12ce0000.i2c > /sys/bus/platform/drivers/s3c-i2c/bind > > > > And one can bind it to the vfio-dt driver, as Antonis instructs, by > > appending a 'vfio-dt' string to the device tree compatible entry for > > the device. Then this would work: > > > > echo 12ce0000.i2c > /sys/bus/platform/drivers/s3c-i2c/12ce0000.i2c/driver/unbind > > echo 12ce0000.i2c > /sys/bus/platform/drivers/vfio-dt/bind > > > > Consequently, the hack patch below [2] allows any platform device to be > > bound to the vfio-dt driver, without making changes to the device > > tree. It's a hack because I don't see having any driver name specific > > code in drivers/base/bus.c being upstream acceptable. > > Modifying the device tree is the worse part of this. I think I missed something. How do you reconcile "without making changes to the device tree" with "appending a 'vfio-dt' string to the device tree compatible entry"? -Scott