From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Wood Subject: Re: [PULL 34/51] powerpc: move debug registers in a structure Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2013 18:03:42 -0600 Message-ID: <1383523422.3410.272.camel@snotra.buserror.net> References: <1383254316-11243-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <1383254316-11243-35-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <20131103143012.GA7513@redhat.com> <1383512174.4776.20.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Gleb Natapov , Alexander Graf , "kvm@vger.kernel.org mailing list" , , Paolo Bonzini , Bharat Bhushan , Bharat Bhushan , To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1383512174.4776.20.camel@pasglop> Sender: kvm-ppc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 07:56 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Sun, 2013-11-03 at 16:30 +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:18:19PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > > > From: Bharat Bhushan > > > > > > This way we can use same data type struct with KVM and > > > also help in using other debug related function. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Bharat Bhushan > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf > > It would be nice to have PPC maintainers (CCed) ACKs here. This patch > > also has merging conflicts with cbc9565e (should be easy to resolve) > > Is it easier if I put it in powerpc -next and resolve the conflicts ? > > I was ok with the patch but yes, I should probably have put it in a > topic branch in the first place and merge it both in my tree and Alex. It's already in your -next via my tree (sha1 51ae8d4a2b9e4aa9a502061b9c39168e08829b94). I didn't realize Alex was planning on applying it. -Scott