From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] KVM and variable-endianness guest CPUs
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:07:36 +1100
Message-ID: <1390867656.3872.35.camel@pasglop>
References: <CAFEAcA-aq9eGy+_7DdWHd2HVu_XcqxeHb_jFur+TkmVnS=qy=g@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAFEAcA-v5NcC_dJv+wF0k-H4BMxwh7TZvkiCw+YoXCiSPDCDfA@mail.gmail.com>
	 <03D15FE3-2A12-4D60-8D20-07D05F3740F6@suse.de>
	 <20140120191919.GH13432@cbox>
	 <CAA3XUr2FoCdOm5_xM77qFs4Kdw-M04KBgY-ghmcbnFqt0Oe7MQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAFEAcA-Mn=Q_KpRYZpFoVAXAnMu8OR_c6rXRCMwjda0kDk7gvg@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAA3XUr35rAjFuUob_KNKsRPL88-xmu-YOCUykEf5pMf7xP+=Fg@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAFEAcA_-dejumAVf6RBD8A47SG2pQFcFVJ91OxcYdasa+CYb0Q@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAA3XUr2szY47gXZE06737GCUiS_n_8pwGm-ndaG8SJLm_rVm7Q@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAFEAcA_PgmuWc=eEmUQjQqpyUTxG=iq7T_CVtg9PrR9WkNqC4g@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAA3XUr0aRkb7uXik_OSaq6tLFUVsayY6bmj-Fg2DLV0ad+M9AA@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAFEAcA_iavwkONpbK+7D9wPbwsp509U1h1pEtxQgy7B6fh_7jg@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAA3XUr04GihHWPd5pusuU2ZUz9DF6YxccSHFfVyPK3YnDaVxbg@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAFEAcA_+kOQzxUeiTsHfHD_5-UYxJ3ZRWvJX83cTo8wbrEOFLg@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAA3XUr3qw7M=yX4_xkjDuLtnCpD4E9R2N0Y68wA7i8eEsuZBVw@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAFEAcA-k3UabNop76TUVvNwpEwUaMTYg2Z80202gjLiQ=e+NJQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Victor Kamensky <victor.kamensky@linaro.org>,
	Thomas Falcon <tlfalcon@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"qemu-ppc@nongnu.org" <qemu-ppc@nongnu.org>,
	"kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:59025 "EHLO gate.crashing.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753170AbaA1AH5 (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 27 Jan 2014 19:07:57 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA-k3UabNop76TUVvNwpEwUaMTYg2Z80202gjLiQ=e+NJQ@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 15:33 +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
>  (4) PPC CPUs in BE mode and ARM CPUs in BE mode are not
>      the same, because in the ARM case it is doing an
>      internal-to-CPU byteswap, and in the PPC case it is not

Aren't they both byte-order invariant ?

In that case they are the same.

Ben.