From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/kvm: support to handle sw breakpoint
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 19:22:19 +1000
Message-ID: <1402996939.7661.126.camel@pasglop>
References: <1402780097-28827-1-git-send-email-maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	 <53A0022D.5020108@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, paulus@samba.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:34666 "EHLO gate.crashing.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753304AbaFQJWl (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 17 Jun 2014 05:22:41 -0400
In-Reply-To: <53A0022D.5020108@suse.de>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Tue, 2014-06-17 at 10:54 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> 
> Also, why don't we use twi always or something else that actually is 
> defined as illegal instruction? I would like to see this shared with 
> book3s_32 PR.

twi will be directed to the guest on HV no ? We want a real illegal
because those go to the host (for potential emulation by the HV). I'm
trying to see if I can get the architect to set one in stone in a future
proof way.

Cheers,
Ben.