From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Vadim Rozenfeld <vrozenfe@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [questions] about KVM as a Microsoft-compatible
 hypervisor
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 20:02:09 +1000
Message-ID: <1404122529.28960.24.camel@localhost>
References: <201406300939223611342@sangfor.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Zhang Haoyu <zhanghy@sangfor.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:25796 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754817AbaF3KC2 (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 30 Jun 2014 06:02:28 -0400
In-Reply-To: <201406300939223611342@sangfor.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, 2014-06-30 at 09:39 +0800, Zhang Haoyu wrote:
> Hi, Vadim
> I read the kvm-2012-forum paper < KVM as a Microsoft-compatible hypervisor>, 
> Any update and other references, please?
> 
> Thanks,
> Zhang Haoyu
> 
> 

Unfortunately, not too much.
>>From the the most recent, we have lazy eoi implemented by 
MST and reference time counter.

Best regards,
Vadim.