From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vadim Rozenfeld Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [questions] about KVM asaMicrosoft-compatiblehypervisor Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 19:55:57 +1000 Message-ID: <1407318957.11187.2.camel@oscar> References: <201406300939223611342@sangfor.com> , <1404122529.28960.24.camel@localhost>, <201406301945131268456@sangfor.com> , <1404130690.28960.39.camel@localhost>, <201408041017396729221@sangfor.com> <201408041429531176607@sangfor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jidong Xiao , qemu-devel , kvm To: Zhang Haoyu Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:63894 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753806AbaHFJ4M (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Aug 2014 05:56:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <201408041429531176607@sangfor.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 14:29 +0800, Zhang Haoyu wrote: > >Hi Zhang, > > > >No I haven't seen such problem > >Which kernel version are you running? > Host kernel: RHEL7-RC1(linux-3.10.0). > > >Does it include the latest lazy eli changes? > > > lazy eli or lazy eoi? EOI > How to confirm whether lazy eli has been included? > not in linux-3.10.0 > >Btw, hv_spinlocks=0xfffffff is a pretty huge value. > > > which value do you advise to use? MS seems to be using 0xffff as a default. best regards, Vadim. > > Thanks, > Zhang Haoyu > >Best regards, > >Vadim. > >