From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
Jens Freimann <jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Subject: [GIT PULL 11/11] KVM: s390: represent SIMD cap in kvm facility
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 12:44:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1426679049-37696-12-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426679049-37696-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
From: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
The patch represents capability KVM_CAP_S390_VECTOR_REGISTERS by means
of the SIMD facility bit. This allows to a) disable the use of SIMD when
used in conjunction with a not-SIMD-aware QEMU, b) to enable SIMD when
used with a SIMD-aware version of QEMU and c) finally by means of a QEMU
version using the future cpu model ioctls.
Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 -
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 19 +++++++++++--------
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h | 11 +++++++++++
3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 2356a8c..b8d1e97 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -562,7 +562,6 @@ struct kvm_arch{
int css_support;
int use_irqchip;
int use_cmma;
- int use_vectors;
int user_cpu_state_ctrl;
int user_sigp;
int user_stsi;
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index 42b8a25..9072127 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -278,8 +278,12 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_enable_cap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_enable_cap *cap)
r = 0;
break;
case KVM_CAP_S390_VECTOR_REGISTERS:
- kvm->arch.use_vectors = MACHINE_HAS_VX;
- r = MACHINE_HAS_VX ? 0 : -EINVAL;
+ if (MACHINE_HAS_VX) {
+ set_kvm_facility(kvm->arch.model.fac->mask, 129);
+ set_kvm_facility(kvm->arch.model.fac->list, 129);
+ r = 0;
+ } else
+ r = -EINVAL;
break;
case KVM_CAP_S390_USER_STSI:
kvm->arch.user_stsi = 1;
@@ -1084,7 +1088,6 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
kvm->arch.css_support = 0;
kvm->arch.use_irqchip = 0;
- kvm->arch.use_vectors = 0;
kvm->arch.epoch = 0;
spin_lock_init(&kvm->arch.start_stop_lock);
@@ -1186,12 +1189,12 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)
{
save_fp_ctl(&vcpu->arch.host_fpregs.fpc);
- if (vcpu->kvm->arch.use_vectors)
+ if (test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 129))
save_vx_regs((__vector128 *)&vcpu->arch.host_vregs->vrs);
else
save_fp_regs(vcpu->arch.host_fpregs.fprs);
save_access_regs(vcpu->arch.host_acrs);
- if (vcpu->kvm->arch.use_vectors) {
+ if (test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 129)) {
restore_fp_ctl(&vcpu->run->s.regs.fpc);
restore_vx_regs((__vector128 *)&vcpu->run->s.regs.vrs);
} else {
@@ -1207,7 +1210,7 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
atomic_clear_mask(CPUSTAT_RUNNING, &vcpu->arch.sie_block->cpuflags);
gmap_disable(vcpu->arch.gmap);
- if (vcpu->kvm->arch.use_vectors) {
+ if (test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 129)) {
save_fp_ctl(&vcpu->run->s.regs.fpc);
save_vx_regs((__vector128 *)&vcpu->run->s.regs.vrs);
} else {
@@ -1216,7 +1219,7 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
}
save_access_regs(vcpu->run->s.regs.acrs);
restore_fp_ctl(&vcpu->arch.host_fpregs.fpc);
- if (vcpu->kvm->arch.use_vectors)
+ if (test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 129))
restore_vx_regs((__vector128 *)&vcpu->arch.host_vregs->vrs);
else
restore_fp_regs(vcpu->arch.host_fpregs.fprs);
@@ -1316,7 +1319,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
vcpu->arch.sie_block->eca |= 1;
if (sclp_has_sigpif())
vcpu->arch.sie_block->eca |= 0x10000000U;
- if (vcpu->kvm->arch.use_vectors) {
+ if (test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 129)) {
vcpu->arch.sie_block->eca |= 0x00020000;
vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecd |= 0x20000000;
}
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
index 5d54191..c5aefef 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h
@@ -149,6 +149,17 @@ static inline int test_kvm_facility(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long nr)
__test_facility(nr, kvm->arch.model.fac->list);
}
+static inline int set_kvm_facility(u64 *fac_list, unsigned long nr)
+{
+ unsigned char *ptr;
+
+ if (nr >= MAX_FACILITY_BIT)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ ptr = (unsigned char *) fac_list + (nr >> 3);
+ *ptr |= (0x80UL >> (nr & 7));
+ return 0;
+}
+
/* are cpu states controlled by user space */
static inline int kvm_s390_user_cpu_state_ctrl(struct kvm *kvm)
{
--
2.3.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-18 11:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-18 11:43 [GIT PULL 00/11] KVM: s390: Features and fixes for 4.1 (kvm/next) Christian Borntraeger
2015-03-18 11:43 ` [GIT PULL 01/11] KVM: s390: Spelling s/intance/instance/ Christian Borntraeger
2015-03-18 11:44 ` [GIT PULL 02/11] KVM: s390: cleanup jump lables in kvm_arch_init_vm Christian Borntraeger
2015-03-18 11:44 ` [GIT PULL 03/11] KVM: s390: Fix low-address protection for real addresses Christian Borntraeger
2015-03-18 11:44 ` [GIT PULL 04/11] KVM: s390: Guest's memory access functions get access registers Christian Borntraeger
2015-03-18 11:44 ` [GIT PULL 05/11] KVM: s390: Optimize paths where get_vcpu_asce() is invoked Christian Borntraeger
2015-03-18 11:44 ` [GIT PULL 06/11] KVM: s390: Add access register mode Christian Borntraeger
2015-03-18 11:44 ` [GIT PULL 07/11] KVM: s390: Add MEMOP ioctls for reading/writing guest memory Christian Borntraeger
2015-03-18 11:44 ` [GIT PULL 08/11] KVM: s390: introduce post handlers for STSI Christian Borntraeger
2015-03-18 11:44 ` [GIT PULL 09/11] KVM: s390: Create ioctl for Getting/Setting guest storage keys Christian Borntraeger
2015-03-18 11:44 ` [GIT PULL 10/11] KVM: s390: drop SIMD bit from kvm_s390_fac_list_mask Christian Borntraeger
2015-03-18 11:44 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2015-03-23 23:32 ` [GIT PULL 00/11] KVM: s390: Features and fixes for 4.1 (kvm/next) Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1426679049-37696-12-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox