From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com, bdas@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 01/13] KVM: x86: introduce num_emulated_msrs
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 19:05:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1432746314-50196-2-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1432746314-50196-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
We will want to filter away MSR_IA32_SMBASE from the emulated_msrs if
the host CPU does not support SMM virtualization. Introduce the
logic to do that, and also move paravirt MSRs to emulated_msrs for
simplicity and to get rid of KVM_SAVE_MSRS_BEGIN.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 2211213a84e7..9dd41de10eb5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -925,17 +925,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_rdpmc);
*
* This list is modified at module load time to reflect the
* capabilities of the host cpu. This capabilities test skips MSRs that are
- * kvm-specific. Those are put in the beginning of the list.
+ * kvm-specific. Those are put in emulated_msrs; filtering of emulated_msrs
+ * may depend on host virtualization features rather than host cpu features.
*/
-#define KVM_SAVE_MSRS_BEGIN 12
static u32 msrs_to_save[] = {
- MSR_KVM_SYSTEM_TIME, MSR_KVM_WALL_CLOCK,
- MSR_KVM_SYSTEM_TIME_NEW, MSR_KVM_WALL_CLOCK_NEW,
- HV_X64_MSR_GUEST_OS_ID, HV_X64_MSR_HYPERCALL,
- HV_X64_MSR_TIME_REF_COUNT, HV_X64_MSR_REFERENCE_TSC,
- HV_X64_MSR_APIC_ASSIST_PAGE, MSR_KVM_ASYNC_PF_EN, MSR_KVM_STEAL_TIME,
- MSR_KVM_PV_EOI_EN,
MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_CS, MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_ESP, MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_EIP,
MSR_STAR,
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
@@ -947,7 +941,14 @@ static u32 msrs_to_save[] = {
static unsigned num_msrs_to_save;
-static const u32 emulated_msrs[] = {
+static u32 emulated_msrs[] = {
+ MSR_KVM_SYSTEM_TIME, MSR_KVM_WALL_CLOCK,
+ MSR_KVM_SYSTEM_TIME_NEW, MSR_KVM_WALL_CLOCK_NEW,
+ HV_X64_MSR_GUEST_OS_ID, HV_X64_MSR_HYPERCALL,
+ HV_X64_MSR_TIME_REF_COUNT, HV_X64_MSR_REFERENCE_TSC,
+ HV_X64_MSR_APIC_ASSIST_PAGE, MSR_KVM_ASYNC_PF_EN, MSR_KVM_STEAL_TIME,
+ MSR_KVM_PV_EOI_EN,
+
MSR_IA32_TSC_ADJUST,
MSR_IA32_TSCDEADLINE,
MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE,
@@ -955,6 +956,8 @@ static const u32 emulated_msrs[] = {
MSR_IA32_MCG_CTL,
};
+static unsigned num_emulated_msrs;
+
bool kvm_valid_efer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 efer)
{
if (efer & efer_reserved_bits)
@@ -2924,7 +2927,7 @@ long kvm_arch_dev_ioctl(struct file *filp,
if (copy_from_user(&msr_list, user_msr_list, sizeof msr_list))
goto out;
n = msr_list.nmsrs;
- msr_list.nmsrs = num_msrs_to_save + ARRAY_SIZE(emulated_msrs);
+ msr_list.nmsrs = num_msrs_to_save + num_emulated_msrs;
if (copy_to_user(user_msr_list, &msr_list, sizeof msr_list))
goto out;
r = -E2BIG;
@@ -2936,7 +2939,7 @@ long kvm_arch_dev_ioctl(struct file *filp,
goto out;
if (copy_to_user(user_msr_list->indices + num_msrs_to_save,
&emulated_msrs,
- ARRAY_SIZE(emulated_msrs) * sizeof(u32)))
+ num_emulated_msrs * sizeof(u32)))
goto out;
r = 0;
break;
@@ -4202,8 +4205,7 @@ static void kvm_init_msr_list(void)
u32 dummy[2];
unsigned i, j;
- /* skip the first msrs in the list. KVM-specific */
- for (i = j = KVM_SAVE_MSRS_BEGIN; i < ARRAY_SIZE(msrs_to_save); i++) {
+ for (i = j = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(msrs_to_save); i++) {
if (rdmsr_safe(msrs_to_save[i], &dummy[0], &dummy[1]) < 0)
continue;
@@ -4228,6 +4230,18 @@ static void kvm_init_msr_list(void)
j++;
}
num_msrs_to_save = j;
+
+ for (i = j = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(emulated_msrs); i++) {
+ switch (emulated_msrs[i]) {
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (j < i)
+ emulated_msrs[j] = emulated_msrs[i];
+ j++;
+ }
+ num_emulated_msrs = j;
}
static int vcpu_mmio_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t addr, int len,
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-27 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-27 17:05 [PATCH v2 00/13] SMM implementation for KVM Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-27 17:05 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-05-27 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] KVM: x86: pass host_initiated to functions that read MSRs Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-27 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] KVM: x86: pass the whole hflags field to emulator and back Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-27 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] KVM: x86: API changes for SMM support Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-28 9:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-28 13:48 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-05-29 18:50 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-05-27 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] KVM: x86: stubs " Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-27 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] KVM: x86: save/load state on SMM switch Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-03 19:02 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-06-04 6:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-04 11:34 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-06-04 13:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-27 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] KVM: add vcpu-specific functions to read/write/translate GFNs Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-29 19:23 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-06-05 10:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-05 12:10 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-06-05 12:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-05 12:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-05 15:13 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-06-05 15:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-27 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] KVM: implement multiple address spaces Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-09 3:20 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-27 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] KVM: x86: pass kvm_mmu_page to gfn_to_rmap Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-09 3:28 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-06-17 8:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-18 4:41 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-27 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] KVM: x86: use vcpu-specific functions to read/write/translate GFNs Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-09 3:38 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-27 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] KVM: x86: work on all available address spaces Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-09 3:45 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-27 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] KVM: x86: add SMM to the MMU role, support SMRAM address space Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-09 4:01 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-06-17 8:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-18 5:02 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-06-18 7:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-27 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] KVM: x86: advertise KVM_CAP_X86_SMM Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-29 19:03 ` [PATCH v2 00/13] SMM implementation for KVM Radim Krčmář
2015-05-29 19:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-04 8:56 ` [PATCH v2 14/13] KVM: x86: latch INITs while in system management mode Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-04 8:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-04 12:26 ` [PATCH v2 00/13] SMM implementation for KVM Radim Krčmář
2015-06-04 13:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-05 10:17 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1432746314-50196-2-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=bdas@redhat.com \
--cc=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).