From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: rkrcmar@redhat.com, guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com, bdas@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 14/13] KVM: x86: latch INITs while in system management mode
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 10:58:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1433408329-11787-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1432746314-50196-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Do not process INITs immediately while in system management mode, keep
it instead in apic->pending_events. Tell userspace if an INIT is
pending when they issue GET_VCPU_EVENTS, and similarly handle the
new field in SET_VCPU_EVENTS.
Note that the same treatment should be done while in VMX non-root mode.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 2 +-
arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h | 5 +++++
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 11 ++++++++++-
5 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
index 91ab5f2354aa..461956a0ee8e 100644
--- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
+++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
@@ -829,7 +829,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_events {
__u8 smm;
__u8 pending;
__u8 smm_inside_nmi;
- __u8 pad;
+ __u8 latched_init;
} smi;
};
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
index 30100a3c1bed..a4ae82eb82aa 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_events {
__u8 smm;
__u8 pending;
__u8 smm_inside_nmi;
- __u8 pad;
+ __u8 latched_init;
} smi;
__u32 reserved[9];
};
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
index b8e47e2b1d94..beeef05bb4d9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
@@ -2057,8 +2057,19 @@ void kvm_apic_accept_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (!kvm_vcpu_has_lapic(vcpu) || !apic->pending_events)
return;
- pe = xchg(&apic->pending_events, 0);
+ /*
+ * INITs are latched while in SMM. Because an SMM CPU cannot
+ * be in KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED state, just eat SIPIs
+ * and delay processing of INIT until the next RSM.
+ */
+ if (is_smm(vcpu)) {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED);
+ if (test_bit(KVM_APIC_SIPI, &apic->pending_events))
+ clear_bit(KVM_APIC_SIPI, &apic->pending_events);
+ return;
+ }
+ pe = xchg(&apic->pending_events, 0);
if (test_bit(KVM_APIC_INIT, &pe)) {
kvm_lapic_reset(vcpu, true);
kvm_vcpu_reset(vcpu, true);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
index 9d8fcde52027..f2f4e10ab772 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h
@@ -159,6 +159,11 @@ static inline bool kvm_lowest_prio_delivery(struct kvm_lapic_irq *irq)
irq->msi_redir_hint);
}
+static inline int kvm_lapic_latched_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ return kvm_vcpu_has_lapic(vcpu) && test_bit(KVM_APIC_INIT, &vcpu->arch.apic->pending_events);
+}
+
bool kvm_apic_pending_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vector);
void wait_lapic_expire(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 36962b7627df..5e6d19730ef9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -3240,7 +3240,7 @@ static void kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_get_vcpu_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
events->smi.pending = vcpu->arch.smi_pending;
events->smi.smm_inside_nmi =
!!(vcpu->arch.hflags & HF_SMM_INSIDE_NMI_MASK);
- events->smi.pad = 0;
+ events->smi.latched_init = kvm_lapic_latched_init(vcpu);
events->flags = (KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_NMI_PENDING
| KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_SHADOW
@@ -3289,6 +3289,12 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_vcpu_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
vcpu->arch.hflags |= HF_SMM_INSIDE_NMI_MASK;
else
vcpu->arch.hflags &= ~HF_SMM_INSIDE_NMI_MASK;
+ if (kvm_vcpu_has_lapic(vcpu)) {
+ if (events->smi.latched_init)
+ set_bit(KVM_APIC_INIT, &vcpu->arch.apic->pending_events);
+ else
+ clear_bit(KVM_APIC_INIT, &vcpu->arch.apic->pending_events);
+ }
}
kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
@@ -5495,6 +5501,9 @@ static void kvm_smm_changed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (unlikely(vcpu->arch.smi_pending)) {
kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_SMI, vcpu);
vcpu->arch.smi_pending = 0;
+ } else {
+ /* Process a latched INIT, if any. */
+ kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
}
}
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-04 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-27 17:05 [PATCH v2 00/13] SMM implementation for KVM Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-27 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] KVM: x86: introduce num_emulated_msrs Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-27 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] KVM: x86: pass host_initiated to functions that read MSRs Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-27 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] KVM: x86: pass the whole hflags field to emulator and back Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-27 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] KVM: x86: API changes for SMM support Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-28 9:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-28 13:48 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-05-29 18:50 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-05-27 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] KVM: x86: stubs " Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-27 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] KVM: x86: save/load state on SMM switch Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-03 19:02 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-06-04 6:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-04 11:34 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-06-04 13:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-27 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] KVM: add vcpu-specific functions to read/write/translate GFNs Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-29 19:23 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-06-05 10:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-05 12:10 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-06-05 12:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-05 12:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-05 15:13 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-06-05 15:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-27 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] KVM: implement multiple address spaces Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-09 3:20 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-27 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] KVM: x86: pass kvm_mmu_page to gfn_to_rmap Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-09 3:28 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-06-17 8:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-18 4:41 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-27 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] KVM: x86: use vcpu-specific functions to read/write/translate GFNs Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-09 3:38 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-27 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] KVM: x86: work on all available address spaces Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-09 3:45 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-05-27 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] KVM: x86: add SMM to the MMU role, support SMRAM address space Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-09 4:01 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-06-17 8:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-18 5:02 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-06-18 7:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-27 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] KVM: x86: advertise KVM_CAP_X86_SMM Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-29 19:03 ` [PATCH v2 00/13] SMM implementation for KVM Radim Krčmář
2015-05-29 19:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-04 8:56 ` [PATCH v2 14/13] KVM: x86: latch INITs while in system management mode Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-04 8:58 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-06-04 12:26 ` [PATCH v2 00/13] SMM implementation for KVM Radim Krčmář
2015-06-04 13:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-05 10:17 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1433408329-11787-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=bdas@redhat.com \
--cc=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).