From: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
To: pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: gleb@kernel.org, mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kai.huang@linux.intel.com,
jike.song@intel.com,
Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 07/11] KVM: page track: add notifier support
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 19:31:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1455449503-20993-8-git-send-email-guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1455449503-20993-1-git-send-email-guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
Notifier list is introduced so that any node wants to receive the track
event can register to the list
Two APIs are introduced here:
- kvm_page_track_register_notifier(): register the notifier to receive
track event
- kvm_page_track_unregister_notifier(): stop receiving track event by
unregister the notifier
The callback, node->track_write() is called when a write access on the
write tracked page happens
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 4 +++
4 files changed, 111 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index d8931d0..282bc2f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -696,6 +696,7 @@ struct kvm_arch {
*/
struct list_head active_mmu_pages;
struct list_head zapped_obsolete_pages;
+ struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head track_notifier_head;
struct list_head assigned_dev_head;
struct iommu_domain *iommu_domain;
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
index 97ac9c3..1aae4ef 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h
@@ -6,6 +6,36 @@ enum kvm_page_track_mode {
KVM_PAGE_TRACK_MAX,
};
+/*
+ * The notifier represented by @kvm_page_track_notifier_node is linked into
+ * the head which will be notified when guest is triggering the track event.
+ *
+ * Write access on the head is protected by kvm->mmu_lock, read access
+ * is protected by track_srcu.
+ */
+struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head {
+ struct srcu_struct track_srcu;
+ struct hlist_head track_notifier_list;
+};
+
+struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node {
+ struct hlist_node node;
+
+ /*
+ * It is called when guest is writing the write-tracked page
+ * and write emulation is finished at that time.
+ *
+ * @vcpu: the vcpu where the write access happened.
+ * @gpa: the physical address written by guest.
+ * @new: the data was written to the address.
+ * @bytes: the written length.
+ */
+ void (*track_write)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, const u8 *new,
+ int bytes);
+};
+
+void kvm_page_track_init(struct kvm *kvm);
+
void kvm_page_track_free_memslot(struct kvm_memory_slot *free,
struct kvm_memory_slot *dont);
int kvm_page_track_create_memslot(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
@@ -25,4 +55,13 @@ void kvm_page_track_remove_page(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn,
enum kvm_page_track_mode mode);
bool kvm_page_track_check_mode(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn,
enum kvm_page_track_mode mode);
+
+void
+kvm_page_track_register_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
+ struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n);
+void
+kvm_page_track_unregister_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
+ struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n);
+void kvm_page_track_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, const u8 *new,
+ int bytes);
#endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c b/arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c
index de9b32f..0692cc6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c
@@ -188,3 +188,70 @@ bool kvm_page_track_check_mode(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn,
return !!ACCESS_ONCE(slot->arch.gfn_track[mode][index]);
}
+
+void kvm_page_track_init(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head;
+
+ head = &kvm->arch.track_notifier_head;
+ init_srcu_struct(&head->track_srcu);
+ INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&head->track_notifier_list);
+}
+
+/*
+ * register the notifier so that event interception for the tracked guest
+ * pages can be received.
+ */
+void
+kvm_page_track_register_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
+ struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n)
+{
+ struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head;
+
+ head = &kvm->arch.track_notifier_head;
+
+ spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+ hlist_add_head_rcu(&n->node, &head->track_notifier_list);
+ spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+}
+
+/*
+ * stop receiving the event interception. It is the opposed operation of
+ * kvm_page_track_register_notifier().
+ */
+void
+kvm_page_track_unregister_notifier(struct kvm *kvm,
+ struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n)
+{
+ struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head;
+
+ head = &kvm->arch.track_notifier_head;
+
+ spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+ hlist_del_rcu(&n->node);
+ spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+ synchronize_srcu(&head->track_srcu);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Notify the node that write access is intercepted and write emulation is
+ * finished at this time.
+ *
+ * The node should figure out if the written page is the one that node is
+ * interested in by itself.
+ */
+void kvm_page_track_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, const u8 *new,
+ int bytes)
+{
+ struct kvm_page_track_notifier_head *head;
+ struct kvm_page_track_notifier_node *n;
+ int idx;
+
+ head = &vcpu->kvm->arch.track_notifier_head;
+
+ idx = srcu_read_lock(&head->track_srcu);
+ hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(n, &head->track_notifier_list, node)
+ if (n->track_write)
+ n->track_write(vcpu, gpa, new, bytes);
+ srcu_read_unlock(&head->track_srcu, idx);
+}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index e25ebb7..98019b6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -4370,6 +4370,7 @@ int emulator_write_phys(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa,
if (ret < 0)
return 0;
kvm_mmu_pte_write(vcpu, gpa, val, bytes);
+ kvm_page_track_write(vcpu, gpa, val, bytes);
return 1;
}
@@ -4628,6 +4629,7 @@ static int emulator_cmpxchg_emulated(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
kvm_vcpu_mark_page_dirty(vcpu, gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT);
kvm_mmu_pte_write(vcpu, gpa, new, bytes);
+ kvm_page_track_write(vcpu, gpa, new, bytes);
return X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
@@ -7748,6 +7750,8 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&kvm->arch.kvmclock_update_work, kvmclock_update_fn);
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&kvm->arch.kvmclock_sync_work, kvmclock_sync_fn);
+ kvm_page_track_init(kvm);
+
return 0;
}
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-14 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-14 11:31 [PATCH v3 00/11] KVM: x86: track guest page access Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 11:31 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] KVM: MMU: rename has_wrprotected_page to mmu_gfn_lpage_is_disallowed Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-19 11:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-14 11:31 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] KVM: MMU: introduce kvm_mmu_gfn_{allow,disallow}_lpage Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-19 11:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-14 11:31 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] KVM: MMU: introduce kvm_mmu_slot_gfn_write_protect Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-19 11:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-14 11:31 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] KVM: page track: add the framework of guest page tracking Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-19 11:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-23 3:57 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 11:31 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] KVM: page track: introduce kvm_page_track_{add,remove}_page Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-19 11:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-23 4:18 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-23 14:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-19 11:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-23 4:18 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 11:31 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] KVM: MMU: let page fault handler be aware tracked page Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-19 11:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-23 4:19 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 11:31 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2016-02-19 11:51 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] KVM: page track: add notifier support Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-23 4:34 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-23 14:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-14 11:31 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] KVM: MMU: use page track for non-leaf shadow pages Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 11:31 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] KVM: MMU: simplify mmu_need_write_protect Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 11:31 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] KVM: MMU: clear write-flooding on the fast path of tracked page Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-19 11:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-23 4:36 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-14 11:31 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] KVM: MMU: apply page track notifier Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-19 11:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-23 4:40 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-23 14:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-19 12:00 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] KVM: x86: track guest page access Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-22 10:05 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-02-23 3:02 ` Jike Song
2016-02-23 5:44 ` Tian, Kevin
2016-02-23 12:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-23 10:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-23 11:50 ` Jike Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1455449503-20993-8-git-send-email-guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
--to=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=jike.song@intel.com \
--cc=kai.huang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).