Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] s390/vfio-ccw rework

[Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>]

On 7/7/22 5:06 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> 
> 
> Am 04.07.22 um 13:25 schrieb Jason Gunthorpe:
>> On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 02:48:25PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>>> Am 01.07.22 um 14:40 schrieb Eric Farman:
>>>> On Thu, 2022-06-30 at 20:44 -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 10:36:36PM +0200, Eric Farman wrote:
>>>>>> Here's an updated pass through the first chunk of vfio-ccw rework.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As with v2, this is all internal to vfio-ccw, with the exception of
>>>>>> the removal of mdev_uuid from include/linux/mdev.h in patch 1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is one conflict with the vfio-next branch [2], on patch 6.
>>>>>
>>>>> What tree do you plan to take it through?
>>>>
>>>> Don't know. I know Matt's PCI series has a conflict with this same
>>>> patch also, but I haven't seen resolution to that. @Christian,
>>>> thoughts?
>>>
>>>
>>> What about me making a topic branch that it being merged by Alex AND 
>>> the KVM tree
>>> so that each of the conflicts can be solved in that way?
>>
>> It make sense, I would base it on Alex's VFIO tree just to avoid
>> some conflicts in the first place. Matt can rebase on this, so lets
>> get things going?
> 
> So yes. Lets rebase on VFIO-next. Ideally Alex would then directly pick 
> Eric
> patches.

@Christian to be clear, do you want me to also rebase the zPCI series on 
vfio-next then?