* [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v12 0/3] ARM PMU tests
@ 2016-11-24 4:23 Wei Huang
2016-11-24 4:23 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v12 1/3] arm: Add PMU test Wei Huang
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wei Huang @ 2016-11-24 4:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cov
Cc: qemu-devel, kvm, kvmarm, shannon.zhao, alistair.francis, croberts,
alindsay, drjones, andre.przywara
Changes from v11:
* Use report_info() to report PMU HW related info (implementer, id code, ...)
* Print PMU PMCR info in the same line
Note:
1) Current KVM code has bugs in handling PMCCFILTR write. A fix (see
below) is required for this unit testing code to work correctly under
KVM mode.
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/pipermail/kvmarm/2016-November/022134.html.
Thanks,
-Wei
Christopher Covington (3):
arm: Add PMU test
arm: pmu: Check cycle count increases
arm: pmu: Add CPI checking
arm/Makefile.common | 3 +-
arm/pmu.c | 350 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arm/unittests.cfg | 19 +++
3 files changed, 371 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 arm/pmu.c
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v12 1/3] arm: Add PMU test
2016-11-24 4:23 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v12 0/3] ARM PMU tests Wei Huang
@ 2016-11-24 4:23 ` Wei Huang
2016-11-24 4:23 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v12 2/3] arm: pmu: Check cycle count increases Wei Huang
2016-11-24 4:23 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v12 3/3] arm: pmu: Add CPI checking Wei Huang
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wei Huang @ 2016-11-24 4:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cov
Cc: alindsay, kvm, andre.przywara, croberts, qemu-devel,
alistair.francis, shannon.zhao, kvmarm
From: Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>
Beginning with a simple sanity check of the control register, add
a unit test for the ARM Performance Monitors Unit (PMU).
Signed-off-by: Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Wei Huang <wei@redhat.com>
---
arm/Makefile.common | 3 ++-
arm/pmu.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arm/unittests.cfg | 5 ++++
3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 arm/pmu.c
diff --git a/arm/Makefile.common b/arm/Makefile.common
index f37b5c2..5da2fdd 100644
--- a/arm/Makefile.common
+++ b/arm/Makefile.common
@@ -12,7 +12,8 @@ endif
tests-common = \
$(TEST_DIR)/selftest.flat \
$(TEST_DIR)/spinlock-test.flat \
- $(TEST_DIR)/pci-test.flat
+ $(TEST_DIR)/pci-test.flat \
+ $(TEST_DIR)/pmu.flat
all: test_cases
diff --git a/arm/pmu.c b/arm/pmu.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..98ebea4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arm/pmu.c
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+/*
+ * Test the ARM Performance Monitors Unit (PMU).
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2015-2016, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
+ * under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License version 2.1 and
+ * only version 2.1 as published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
+ * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
+ * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU Lesser General Public License
+ * for more details.
+ */
+#include "libcflat.h"
+#include "asm/barrier.h"
+
+#define PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT 11
+#define PMU_PMCR_N_MASK 0x1f
+#define PMU_PMCR_ID_SHIFT 16
+#define PMU_PMCR_ID_MASK 0xff
+#define PMU_PMCR_IMP_SHIFT 24
+#define PMU_PMCR_IMP_MASK 0xff
+
+#if defined(__arm__)
+static inline uint32_t pmcr_read(void)
+{
+ uint32_t ret;
+
+ asm volatile("mrc p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 0" : "=r" (ret));
+ return ret;
+}
+#elif defined(__aarch64__)
+static inline uint32_t pmcr_read(void)
+{
+ uint32_t ret;
+
+ asm volatile("mrs %0, pmcr_el0" : "=r" (ret));
+ return ret;
+}
+#endif
+
+/*
+ * As a simple sanity check on the PMCR_EL0, ensure the implementer field isn't
+ * null. Also print out a couple other interesting fields for diagnostic
+ * purposes. For example, as of fall 2016, QEMU TCG mode doesn't implement
+ * event counters and therefore reports zero event counters, but hopefully
+ * support for at least the instructions event will be added in the future and
+ * the reported number of event counters will become nonzero.
+ */
+static bool check_pmcr(void)
+{
+ uint32_t pmcr;
+
+ pmcr = pmcr_read();
+
+ report_info("PMU implementer/ID code/counters: 0x%x(\"%c\")/0x%x/%d",
+ (pmcr >> PMU_PMCR_IMP_SHIFT) & PMU_PMCR_IMP_MASK,
+ ((pmcr >> PMU_PMCR_IMP_SHIFT) & PMU_PMCR_IMP_MASK) ? : ' ',
+ (pmcr >> PMU_PMCR_ID_SHIFT) & PMU_PMCR_ID_MASK,
+ (pmcr >> PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT) & PMU_PMCR_N_MASK);
+
+ return ((pmcr >> PMU_PMCR_IMP_SHIFT) & PMU_PMCR_IMP_MASK) != 0;
+}
+
+int main(void)
+{
+ report_prefix_push("pmu");
+
+ report("Control register", check_pmcr());
+
+ return report_summary();
+}
diff --git a/arm/unittests.cfg b/arm/unittests.cfg
index ae32a42..816f494 100644
--- a/arm/unittests.cfg
+++ b/arm/unittests.cfg
@@ -58,3 +58,8 @@ groups = selftest
[pci-test]
file = pci-test.flat
groups = pci
+
+# Test PMU support
+[pmu]
+file = pmu.flat
+groups = pmu
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v12 2/3] arm: pmu: Check cycle count increases
2016-11-24 4:23 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v12 0/3] ARM PMU tests Wei Huang
2016-11-24 4:23 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v12 1/3] arm: Add PMU test Wei Huang
@ 2016-11-24 4:23 ` Wei Huang
2016-11-24 4:23 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v12 3/3] arm: pmu: Add CPI checking Wei Huang
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wei Huang @ 2016-11-24 4:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cov
Cc: alindsay, kvm, andre.przywara, croberts, qemu-devel,
alistair.francis, shannon.zhao, kvmarm
From: Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>
Ensure that reads of the PMCCNTR_EL0 are monotonically increasing,
even for the smallest delta of two subsequent reads.
Signed-off-by: Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Wei Huang <wei@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
---
arm/pmu.c | 156 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 156 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arm/pmu.c b/arm/pmu.c
index 98ebea4..3ae6545 100644
--- a/arm/pmu.c
+++ b/arm/pmu.c
@@ -15,6 +15,9 @@
#include "libcflat.h"
#include "asm/barrier.h"
+#define PMU_PMCR_E (1 << 0)
+#define PMU_PMCR_C (1 << 2)
+#define PMU_PMCR_LC (1 << 6)
#define PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT 11
#define PMU_PMCR_N_MASK 0x1f
#define PMU_PMCR_ID_SHIFT 16
@@ -22,6 +25,14 @@
#define PMU_PMCR_IMP_SHIFT 24
#define PMU_PMCR_IMP_MASK 0xff
+#define ID_DFR0_PERFMON_SHIFT 24
+#define ID_DFR0_PERFMON_MASK 0xf
+
+#define PMU_CYCLE_IDX 31
+
+#define NR_SAMPLES 10
+
+static unsigned int pmu_version;
#if defined(__arm__)
static inline uint32_t pmcr_read(void)
{
@@ -30,6 +41,69 @@ static inline uint32_t pmcr_read(void)
asm volatile("mrc p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 0" : "=r" (ret));
return ret;
}
+
+static inline void pmcr_write(uint32_t value)
+{
+ asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 0" : : "r" (value));
+ isb();
+}
+
+static inline void pmselr_write(uint32_t value)
+{
+ asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 5" : : "r" (value));
+ isb();
+}
+
+static inline void pmxevtyper_write(uint32_t value)
+{
+ asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 1" : : "r" (value));
+}
+
+static inline uint64_t pmccntr_read(void)
+{
+ uint32_t lo, hi = 0;
+
+ if (pmu_version == 0x3)
+ asm volatile("mrrc p15, 0, %0, %1, c9" : "=r" (lo), "=r" (hi));
+ else
+ asm volatile("mrc p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 0" : "=r" (lo));
+
+ return ((uint64_t)hi << 32) | lo;
+}
+
+static inline void pmccntr_write(uint64_t value)
+{
+ uint32_t lo, hi;
+
+ lo = value & 0xffffffff;
+ hi = (value >> 32) & 0xffffffff;
+
+ if (pmu_version == 0x3)
+ asm volatile("mcrr p15, 0, %0, %1, c9" : : "r" (lo), "r" (hi));
+ else
+ asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 0" : : "r" (lo));
+}
+
+static inline void pmcntenset_write(uint32_t value)
+{
+ asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 1" : : "r" (value));
+}
+
+/* PMCCFILTR is an obsolete name for PMXEVTYPER31 in ARMv7 */
+static inline void pmccfiltr_write(uint32_t value)
+{
+ pmselr_write(PMU_CYCLE_IDX);
+ pmxevtyper_write(value);
+ isb();
+}
+
+static inline uint32_t id_dfr0_read(void)
+{
+ uint32_t val;
+
+ asm volatile("mrc p15, 0, %0, c0, c1, 2" : "=r" (val));
+ return val;
+}
#elif defined(__aarch64__)
static inline uint32_t pmcr_read(void)
{
@@ -38,6 +112,44 @@ static inline uint32_t pmcr_read(void)
asm volatile("mrs %0, pmcr_el0" : "=r" (ret));
return ret;
}
+
+static inline void pmcr_write(uint32_t value)
+{
+ asm volatile("msr pmcr_el0, %0" : : "r" (value));
+ isb();
+}
+
+static inline uint64_t pmccntr_read(void)
+{
+ uint64_t cycles;
+
+ asm volatile("mrs %0, pmccntr_el0" : "=r" (cycles));
+ return cycles;
+}
+
+static inline void pmccntr_write(uint64_t value)
+{
+ asm volatile("msr pmccntr_el0, %0" : : "r" (value));
+}
+
+static inline void pmcntenset_write(uint32_t value)
+{
+ asm volatile("msr pmcntenset_el0, %0" : : "r" (value));
+}
+
+static inline void pmccfiltr_write(uint32_t value)
+{
+ asm volatile("msr pmccfiltr_el0, %0" : : "r" (value));
+ isb();
+}
+
+static inline uint32_t id_dfr0_read(void)
+{
+ uint32_t id;
+
+ asm volatile("mrs %0, id_dfr0_el1" : "=r" (id));
+ return id;
+}
#endif
/*
@@ -63,11 +175,55 @@ static bool check_pmcr(void)
return ((pmcr >> PMU_PMCR_IMP_SHIFT) & PMU_PMCR_IMP_MASK) != 0;
}
+/*
+ * Ensure that the cycle counter progresses between back-to-back reads.
+ */
+static bool check_cycles_increase(void)
+{
+ bool success = true;
+
+ /* init before event access, this test only cares about cycle count */
+ pmcntenset_write(1 << PMU_CYCLE_IDX);
+ pmccfiltr_write(0); /* count cycles in EL0, EL1, but not EL2 */
+ pmccntr_write(0);
+
+ pmcr_write(pmcr_read() | PMU_PMCR_LC | PMU_PMCR_C | PMU_PMCR_E);
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < NR_SAMPLES; i++) {
+ uint64_t a, b;
+
+ a = pmccntr_read();
+ b = pmccntr_read();
+
+ if (a >= b) {
+ printf("Read %"PRId64" then %"PRId64".\n", a, b);
+ success = false;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ pmcr_write(pmcr_read() & ~PMU_PMCR_E);
+
+ return success;
+}
+
+void pmu_init(void)
+{
+ uint32_t dfr0;
+
+ /* probe pmu version */
+ dfr0 = id_dfr0_read();
+ pmu_version = (dfr0 >> ID_DFR0_PERFMON_SHIFT) & ID_DFR0_PERFMON_MASK;
+ report_info("PMU version: %d", pmu_version);
+}
+
int main(void)
{
report_prefix_push("pmu");
+ pmu_init();
report("Control register", check_pmcr());
+ report("Monotonically increasing cycle count", check_cycles_increase());
return report_summary();
}
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v12 3/3] arm: pmu: Add CPI checking
2016-11-24 4:23 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v12 0/3] ARM PMU tests Wei Huang
2016-11-24 4:23 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v12 1/3] arm: Add PMU test Wei Huang
2016-11-24 4:23 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v12 2/3] arm: pmu: Check cycle count increases Wei Huang
@ 2016-11-24 4:23 ` Wei Huang
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wei Huang @ 2016-11-24 4:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cov
Cc: alindsay, kvm, andre.przywara, croberts, qemu-devel,
alistair.francis, shannon.zhao, kvmarm
From: Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>
Calculate the numbers of cycles per instruction (CPI) implied by ARM
PMU cycle counter values. The code includes a strict checking facility
intended for the -icount option in TCG mode in the configuration file.
Signed-off-by: Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Wei Huang <wei@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
---
arm/pmu.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
arm/unittests.cfg | 14 +++++++
2 files changed, 136 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arm/pmu.c b/arm/pmu.c
index 3ae6545..f05d00d 100644
--- a/arm/pmu.c
+++ b/arm/pmu.c
@@ -104,6 +104,27 @@ static inline uint32_t id_dfr0_read(void)
asm volatile("mrc p15, 0, %0, c0, c1, 2" : "=r" (val));
return val;
}
+
+/*
+ * Extra instructions inserted by the compiler would be difficult to compensate
+ * for, so hand assemble everything between, and including, the PMCR accesses
+ * to start and stop counting. isb instructions were inserted to make sure
+ * pmccntr read after this function returns the exact instructions executed in
+ * the controlled block. Total instrs = isb + mcr + 2*loop = 2 + 2*loop.
+ */
+static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr)
+{
+ asm volatile(
+ " mcr p15, 0, %[pmcr], c9, c12, 0\n"
+ " isb\n"
+ "1: subs %[loop], %[loop], #1\n"
+ " bgt 1b\n"
+ " mcr p15, 0, %[z], c9, c12, 0\n"
+ " isb\n"
+ : [loop] "+r" (loop)
+ : [pmcr] "r" (pmcr), [z] "r" (0)
+ : "cc");
+}
#elif defined(__aarch64__)
static inline uint32_t pmcr_read(void)
{
@@ -150,6 +171,27 @@ static inline uint32_t id_dfr0_read(void)
asm volatile("mrs %0, id_dfr0_el1" : "=r" (id));
return id;
}
+
+/*
+ * Extra instructions inserted by the compiler would be difficult to compensate
+ * for, so hand assemble everything between, and including, the PMCR accesses
+ * to start and stop counting. isb instructions are inserted to make sure
+ * pmccntr read after this function returns the exact instructions executed
+ * in the controlled block. Total instrs = isb + msr + 2*loop = 2 + 2*loop.
+ */
+static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr)
+{
+ asm volatile(
+ " msr pmcr_el0, %[pmcr]\n"
+ " isb\n"
+ "1: subs %[loop], %[loop], #1\n"
+ " b.gt 1b\n"
+ " msr pmcr_el0, xzr\n"
+ " isb\n"
+ : [loop] "+r" (loop)
+ : [pmcr] "r" (pmcr)
+ : "cc");
+}
#endif
/*
@@ -207,6 +249,79 @@ static bool check_cycles_increase(void)
return success;
}
+/*
+ * Execute a known number of guest instructions. Only even instruction counts
+ * greater than or equal to 4 are supported by the in-line assembly code. The
+ * control register (PMCR_EL0) is initialized with the provided value (allowing
+ * for example for the cycle counter or event counters to be reset). At the end
+ * of the exact instruction loop, zero is written to PMCR_EL0 to disable
+ * counting, allowing the cycle counter or event counters to be read at the
+ * leisure of the calling code.
+ */
+static void measure_instrs(int num, uint32_t pmcr)
+{
+ int loop = (num - 2) / 2;
+
+ assert(num >= 4 && ((num - 2) % 2 == 0));
+ precise_instrs_loop(loop, pmcr);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Measure cycle counts for various known instruction counts. Ensure that the
+ * cycle counter progresses (similar to check_cycles_increase() but with more
+ * instructions and using reset and stop controls). If supplied a positive,
+ * nonzero CPI parameter, also strictly check that every measurement matches
+ * it. Strict CPI checking is used to test -icount mode.
+ */
+static bool check_cpi(int cpi)
+{
+ uint32_t pmcr = pmcr_read() | PMU_PMCR_LC | PMU_PMCR_C | PMU_PMCR_E;
+
+ /* init before event access, this test only cares about cycle count */
+ pmcntenset_write(1 << PMU_CYCLE_IDX);
+ pmccfiltr_write(0); /* count cycles in EL0, EL1, but not EL2 */
+
+ if (cpi > 0)
+ printf("Checking for CPI=%d.\n", cpi);
+ printf("instrs : cycles0 cycles1 ...\n");
+
+ for (unsigned int i = 4; i < 300; i += 32) {
+ uint64_t avg, sum = 0;
+
+ printf("%d :", i);
+ for (int j = 0; j < NR_SAMPLES; j++) {
+ uint64_t cycles;
+
+ pmccntr_write(0);
+ measure_instrs(i, pmcr);
+ cycles = pmccntr_read();
+ printf(" %"PRId64"", cycles);
+
+ if (!cycles) {
+ printf("\ncycles not incrementing!\n");
+ return false;
+ } else if (cpi > 0 && cycles != i * cpi) {
+ printf("\nunexpected cycle count received!\n");
+ return false;
+ } else if ((cycles >> 32) != 0) {
+ /* The cycles taken by the loop above should
+ * fit in 32 bits easily. We check the upper
+ * 32 bits of the cycle counter to make sure
+ * there is no supprise. */
+ printf("\ncycle count bigger than 32bit!\n");
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ sum += cycles;
+ }
+ avg = sum / NR_SAMPLES;
+ printf(" sum=%"PRId64" avg=%"PRId64" avg_ipc=%"PRId64" "
+ "avg_cpi=%"PRId64"\n", sum, avg, i / avg, avg / i);
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
void pmu_init(void)
{
uint32_t dfr0;
@@ -217,13 +332,19 @@ void pmu_init(void)
report_info("PMU version: %d", pmu_version);
}
-int main(void)
+int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
+ int cpi = 0;
+
+ if (argc > 1)
+ cpi = atol(argv[1]);
+
report_prefix_push("pmu");
pmu_init();
report("Control register", check_pmcr());
report("Monotonically increasing cycle count", check_cycles_increase());
+ report("Cycle/instruction ratio", check_cpi(cpi));
return report_summary();
}
diff --git a/arm/unittests.cfg b/arm/unittests.cfg
index 816f494..044d97c 100644
--- a/arm/unittests.cfg
+++ b/arm/unittests.cfg
@@ -63,3 +63,17 @@ groups = pci
[pmu]
file = pmu.flat
groups = pmu
+
+# Test PMU support (TCG) with -icount IPC=1
+[pmu-tcg-icount-1]
+file = pmu.flat
+extra_params = -icount 0 -append '1'
+groups = pmu
+accel = tcg
+
+# Test PMU support (TCG) with -icount IPC=256
+[pmu-tcg-icount-256]
+file = pmu.flat
+extra_params = -icount 8 -append '256'
+groups = pmu
+accel = tcg
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-11-24 4:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-11-24 4:23 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v12 0/3] ARM PMU tests Wei Huang
2016-11-24 4:23 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v12 1/3] arm: Add PMU test Wei Huang
2016-11-24 4:23 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v12 2/3] arm: pmu: Check cycle count increases Wei Huang
2016-11-24 4:23 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v12 3/3] arm: pmu: Add CPI checking Wei Huang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).